Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 16:02:23 12/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 13, 2003 at 18:29:42, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >On December 13, 2003 at 18:12:17, Russell Reagan wrote: > >>On December 13, 2003 at 05:31:25, Amir Ban wrote: >> >>>Well, if without Chessbase engines you'll have a better event and make progress, >>>I won't stand in your way. >> >>Your statement sounds like the people who tried to hold on to DOS too long when >>Windows (and other multitasking operating systems) were clearly the future. >>"Well, if without real mode you'll have better programs and make progress, I >>won't stand in your way." You don't hear too many of those people these days. Is >>Ed Schröder the only one left? :) Clearly, multiuser and multitasking operating >>systems are progress over DOS. >> >>45 participants is a heck of a lot more than 14. If there are 40 participants >>instead, that's still a heck of a lot more than 14, with plenty of strong >>competition. If we had this kind of participation along with the Chessbase >>engines, that would be great, but I'll take 40+ participants with no Chessbase >>participants over 14 including Chessbase participants. > >What was the average rating in Graz? What is the average rating in CCT? By this logic the tournament would have been even better with only Shredder, Junior and Fritz. The others just dragged down the rating, obviously. >If quantity is the only important factor for you, then you can take 100 free >winboard engines, run a tournament on your computer, and crown the winner with >the world champion title. Quantity is important, quantity means support, interest and recognition. Where was Tiger, where was Rebel, Ruffian, SmarThink, Crafty, Yace... in your little shootout? Could it be they didn't find it worth the trouble, or were they just too busy preparing for CCT6? -S.
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.