Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Technical question regarding interface for CCT

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 16:28:03 12/13/03

Go up one level in this thread


On December 13, 2003 at 19:15:00, Omid David Tabibi wrote:

>>By this logic the tournament would have been even better with only Shredder,
>>Junior and Fritz.
>>The others just dragged down the rating, obviously.
>
>OK, let me put it this way: how many top programs participated in Graz? How many
>will participate in CCT?
>
>Having a chess championship without Junior/Fritz/Shredder is like having a
>football worldcup without Brazil, Italy, Germany, England... (and if like CCT
>you don't have any "drug tests", then Argentina will easily win, thanks to
>Maradona :)

If the list had been complete with Tiger, Ruffian and the rest of the heavy
hitters I would agree you had some point, but your list is only half complete so
the argument doesn't really work.

In CCT we have a big part of those missing in Graz, I'd say a combined
tournament would have been a really awesome event. Instead we have something
like the FIDE and PCA championship.

I still prefer the CCT overall due to the wider appeal with a more modern
format.

>>>If quantity is the only important factor for you, then you can take 100 free
>>>winboard engines, run a tournament on your computer, and crown the winner with
>>>the world champion title.
>>
>>Quantity is important, quantity means support, interest and recognition.
>>
>>Where was Tiger, where was Rebel, Ruffian, SmarThink, Crafty, Yace... in your
>>little shootout?
>
>Had they thought they had any chance to win the championship, they would have
>shown up.

There is always a chance if you go, there is no chance if you don't go.

-S.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.