Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 17:41:18 12/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 13, 2003 at 19:25:06, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >On December 13, 2003 at 19:08:06, Matthew Hull wrote: > >>[snip] >>>> >>>>What "official title"? European World Computer Chess Champion? CCT-6 >>>>Computer Chess Champion? ACM International Computer Chess Champion? >>> >>>World Computer Chess Champion. >> >> >>Baloney. Nobody is going to recognize Shredder as WC > >Hmmm, more than 2000 websites who seem to care about the WCCC champion are >called "nobody" then? http://www.google.com/search?q=computer+chess++graz Tell us how much of that background radiation is negative? That's not the kind a "caring" an event needs. > >Let's replace the world "graz" in our search with the word "cct": >http://www.google.com/search?q=computer+chess+cct >463 results! > > > >>becaue Shredder did not >>win the WC, because your precious in-person event was a complete bust, even >>though no one cheated (as far as we know). >> >>The "in-person" emphasis is manifestly a crock. What more evidence does one >>need? >> >> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>The physical presence of the programmers (or operators) is inevitable for an >>>>>official event, especially one giving the title "World Computer Chess Champion" >>>>>to the winner. >> >> >>The title means nothing now. Too few participants and a bogus "winner".
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.