Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 05:26:56 12/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 2003 at 07:15:08, stuart taylor wrote: >On December 14, 2003 at 03:50:21, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>On December 14, 2003 at 03:31:47, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>On December 13, 2003 at 23:56:06, enrico carrisco wrote: >>> >>>>On December 13, 2003 at 22:09:22, stuart taylor wrote: >>>> >>>>>Including speed, for all applications? Or for all chess programs? >>>>>If not, why did they now make 2.2 (or 2.0?). >>>>>S.Taylor >>>> >>>>What "3.2GHz" cpu do you speak of? A P4? If so, yes, you would see a nice >>>>speed up even on 32-bit apps, chess or non-chess. >>> >>>I'm speaking of the same company, AMD. >>>If the difference varies from program to program, which Ghz. of 64 bit-AMD would >>>you say, is safely a speed-up (over amd/32/3.2Ghz) on ANY application (32 or >>>64)? >>>S.Taylor >> >>There is no 3.2GHz AMD processor. > >Oh! > >So whatever it was. 3 Ghz? 2.8 Ghz? > >Funny, I thought the 3.2 was Amd. Sorry, I should have given a better answer last night. AMD has processors they call 3200+, but they are actually 2.2(32-bit) or 2.0(64-bit) GHz.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.