Author: stuart taylor
Date: 07:14:13 12/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 2003 at 08:26:56, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >On December 14, 2003 at 07:15:08, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On December 14, 2003 at 03:50:21, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >> >>>On December 14, 2003 at 03:31:47, stuart taylor wrote: >>> >>>>On December 13, 2003 at 23:56:06, enrico carrisco wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 13, 2003 at 22:09:22, stuart taylor wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Including speed, for all applications? Or for all chess programs? >>>>>>If not, why did they now make 2.2 (or 2.0?). >>>>>>S.Taylor >>>>> >>>>>What "3.2GHz" cpu do you speak of? A P4? If so, yes, you would see a nice >>>>>speed up even on 32-bit apps, chess or non-chess. >>>> >>>>I'm speaking of the same company, AMD. >>>>If the difference varies from program to program, which Ghz. of 64 bit-AMD would >>>>you say, is safely a speed-up (over amd/32/3.2Ghz) on ANY application (32 or >>>>64)? >>>>S.Taylor >>> >>>There is no 3.2GHz AMD processor. >> >>Oh! >> >>So whatever it was. 3 Ghz? 2.8 Ghz? >> >>Funny, I thought the 3.2 was Amd. > >Sorry, I should have given a better answer last night. AMD has processors they >call 3200+, but they are actually 2.2(32-bit) or 2.0(64-bit) GHz. That's MAD! I got my AMD of 1.4 Ghz. three and a half years ago (or was it 2.5? I think it was 3.5) and all they got to now is 2.2 Ghz!? Hasn't even doubled once! S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.