Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:34:02 12/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 2003 at 02:51:02, Russell Reagan wrote: >On December 15, 2003 at 01:17:53, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > >>You gave this as an example of: >> >> (no winning chances) AND (participation) (1) >> >>in order contradict what I said, which was >> >> (winning chances) -> (participation) (2) >> >>I fail to see how (1) contradicts (2). >> >>In other words, you tried to contradict >> >> A -> B >> >>by giving the example >> >> ~A and B > >Isn't that correct? IIRC, ~A and B is equivalent to ~(A -> B) No ~A and B happens only if A=false and B=true ~(A->B) happens only if A=true and B=false Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.