Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Technical question regarding interface for CCT

Author: Omid David Tabibi

Date: 10:51:19 12/15/03

Go up one level in this thread


On December 15, 2003 at 10:12:13, Thomas Mayer wrote:

>Hi Omid,
>
>I don't really get your point in this discussion. I think you can not claim Bob
>that he would only participate when he thinks that he can win -

Let's review again what I said:

"If you think you have a chance to win, you will participate".

"chance to win" -> "participation".

This statement doesn't say *anything* at all about the state of "no chance to
win". For some reason Bob thinks that

"chance to win" -> "participation"

is equivalent to

"no chance to win" -> "no participation"

which is terribly wrong.

Most participants in Graz came knowing that they didn't have any reasonable
chances to win. Even I knew perfectly well that running on the slowest hardware
there, my winning chances are very slim.

Well, none of these contradict my claim.



> several times he
>has shown up at WCCCs with very minimal chances...

Again, this doesn't contradict what I said.



>Besides, I definitely believe that he has some chances with some big hardware.
>
>Bob shows us his reasons why he did not participate and why he does not want to
>participate in the upcoming WCCC at Israel. I do not agree with his reasons, but
>anyway I respect them somehow.
>
>I think only for the professionals exists the problem to have some chances to
>win or not -> to end like e.g. Deep Sjeng did (And I know it can do definitely
>better) is not very good for the sales. For us amateurs this is different, I
>believe. The olympic idea that participating is everything is still very high in
>my opinion - at least it was the reason for me to participate.

Bad luck is always there. In Graz, Falcon and Sjeng competed on who gets the
worst luck! I was extremely unhappy with Falcon's results, as I'm sure GCP is
with Sjeng's result, but as result both GCP and I will work harder on our
programs to improve them.

I suggest than in summer 2004 you conduct a test between the latest versions of
Sjeng and another commercial engine which doesn't show up to tournaments. I bet
Sjeng will be *far* stronger, because by participating in tournaments it always
becomes stronger, just like human players.


>Already before
>the start it was clear to me that my combination of book, engine and hardware
>has very low chances to win there (There is ALWAYS a chance, but say it was
>1:1.000.000 - which is better then in a lottery... :) - I was quite aware about
>the fact that I would fight for not being last. Anyway, how often would I get
>the chance to participate at a world championship ? For me that was a dream
>since 1986 (reading everything about WCCC 1986 - winner: Cray Blitz) - and I
>think that when you have the chance to get a dream reality you should take that
>chance...

I completely agree with you, and again, I don't see how it contradicts what I
said.



>
>Greets, Thomas
>
>P.S.: I will definitely try to get to Israel next year, but for now this is
>unsure because of business issues and still because of my girlfriend which has
>some problems with the security at the tournament site... Anyway I will try to
>convince her.

Look forward to seeing you here! As far as security goes, on May there will be a
large number of Europeans in the Tel-Aviv area, coming for the final-four of
EuroLeague, finals of European Basketball Association.






This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.