Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:13:50 12/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 2003 at 16:08:12, Dann Corbit wrote: >On December 15, 2003 at 15:57:51, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 15, 2003 at 15:49:14, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On December 15, 2003 at 15:21:57, Tord Romstad wrote: >>> >>>>On December 15, 2003 at 13:58:02, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>> >>>>>Number of tests: 183 >>>>>Max score: 183 >>>>>Engines score: 165 >>>>>Number with full score: 165 >>>>>Found in: 1 sec = 28, 2 sec = 11, 5 sec = 29, 10 sec = 20, 30 sec = 30, 1 min = >>>>>9, 2 min = 12, 5 min = 17, 10 min = 4, 30 min = 5, >>>>>Time used for tests (wrong answer=900s): 27361s >>>>> >>>>>Positions with error (id): >>>>>ECM.1068, ECM.1197, ECM.1204, ECM.1217, ECM.1227, >>>>>ECM.1229, ECM.1265, ECM.1273, ECM.1294, ECM.1308, ECM.1314, >>>>>ECM.1438, ECM.1533, ECM.1592, ECM.1612, ECM.1617, ECM.1621, >>>>>ECM.1622 >>>> >>>>Thanks for the results, Dann! It looks slightly disappointing, even >>>>considering the slow hardware. The results for Gothmog 0.4.2g on a Pentium >>>>IV 2.4 GHz: >>>> >>>>Found in: 1 sec = 72, 2 sec = 22, 5 sec = 26, 10 sec = 13, 30 sec = 15 >>>> >>>>I've never found the patience to run the test with more than 30 seconds >>>>per position. >>> >>>At 30 seconds, you solve 148. Your machine is about 3 times as fast as the one >>>I am using. >> >>I think that it is less than 3 time faster because PIV is known to be slower for >>chess. >> >>> >>>So your results are about the same as crafty's: >>>149 at 2 min is the closest measure to your score. You seem to solve some >>>faster initially. >>> >>>If you have a weekend of machine time, I would be interested to know how your >>>program does given 15 minutes per position. The result of Gothmog is very >>>impressive to me. >> >>I think that the most impressive result for the free programs is probably >>knightdreamer's result. > >I saw that page. I don't understand the units. If he really solved all those >problems in 1/10 of a second, it would be astonishing. I think it must be >minutes. I suggest that you download it and try it. I am sure that it was not minutes otherwise knightdreamer could be clearly weaker than Crafty in tactics and I remember based on tests of other testers like thomas mayer that it was one of the strongest programs in ecm-gcp test suite. It may be interesting to see also results of knightdreamer in that test suite at longer time control. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.