Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 13:41:37 12/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 2003 at 16:18:31, Martin Andersen wrote: >On December 15, 2003 at 16:03:35, Russell Reagan wrote: > >. It >>looks like your compiler is slightly newer (3.3.2 vs. 3.2.2), but surely that >>doesn't account for 754 Knps vs. 904 Knps. Even Aaron Gordon's compile of Crafty >>19.7 using the Intel compiler only gets 880 Knps on my machine. Usually the >>Intel compiler is at least as fast, and hardly ever slower, especially after >>profile guided optimization. Did you get profile guided optimization to work >>with Crafty and gcc by any chance? > >Maybe you have something running in the background, have you checked >with top ? Another bench gave me about 960 Knps, so is Crafty bench >reliable ? I don't know what the deal is. Aaron Gordon's new compile on a 1.6GHz Athlon is faster than all of our compiles on our 2GHz Athons... Athlon XP 1.6GHz(1900+): Total nodes: 100409445 Raw nodes per second: 965475 Total elapsed time: 104 SMP time-to-ply measurement: 6.153846
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.