Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Technical question regarding interface for CCT

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 18:23:21 12/15/03

Go up one level in this thread


On December 15, 2003 at 13:38:26, Omid David Tabibi wrote:

>On December 15, 2003 at 09:59:08, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>

>>
>>Again, that is semantic nonsense.  You said that we don't go because we
>>don't think we have a chance to win.  I said I did go knowing I didn't have
>>a chance to win.
>>
>>Is that so hard to follow?
>
>Oh my, how did you pass your logics exam?

Quite easily, in fact.  It is you I am worried about





>
>Enough is enough. I refuse to continue this discussion as long as you refuse to
>understand basic logic.
>

      Had they thought they had any chance to win the championship, they
      would have shown up.

It isn't my basic logic that is flawed.  It is your refusal to admit what
you actually said.  You keep changing it.  I am now quoting it in every
response of mine to eliminate the obfuscative cloud you are introducing.

Of course, running and hiding is one way to escape repercussions for
your stupid statement.

Your statement is stupid.  There is no way to salvage it, because it doesn't
apply to anybody.  I _gave_ my reasons for not attending.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.