Author: martin fierz
Date: 22:41:15 12/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 2003 at 16:09:44, Dann Corbit wrote: >On December 15, 2003 at 16:01:17, martin fierz wrote: > >>On December 15, 2003 at 13:58:02, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>Number of tests: 183 >>>Max score: 183 >>>Engines score: 165 >>>Number with full score: 165 >>>Found in: 1 sec = 28, 2 sec = 11, 5 sec = 29, 10 sec = 20, 30 sec = 30, 1 min = >>>9, 2 min = 12, 5 min = 17, 10 min = 4, 30 min = 5, >>>Time used for tests (wrong answer=900s): 27361s >>> >>>Positions with error (id): >>>ECM.1068, ECM.1197, ECM.1204, ECM.1217, ECM.1227, >>>ECM.1229, ECM.1265, ECM.1273, ECM.1294, ECM.1308, ECM.1314, >>>ECM.1438, ECM.1533, ECM.1592, ECM.1612, ECM.1617, ECM.1621, >>>ECM.1622 >> >>BTW, how do you get these results? i use crafty 19.06 within arena on an athlon >>XP1600+, and when i run ECMGCP at 5 seconds per move arena tells me that crafty >>solves 91 of 183 positions. is there any difference to 19.07? what are you using >>to run the EPD? > >Your machine is much faster than the one that I used. i know, i know. but yet, you are seeing MANY more positions solved, something cannot be right with either of our setups. the draw detect option will have a negligible influence in this test suite and cannot explain the huge discrepancy. >I am using gradualtest. so what does that do? does it count the position as solved if the correct move ever shows up, and gets lost again? arena will check after the allotted time, and even if you were showing the move once, it will take the one you're currently showing; which makes sense. cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.