Author: martin fierz
Date: 22:51:57 12/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 2003 at 16:09:44, Dann Corbit wrote: >On December 15, 2003 at 16:01:17, martin fierz wrote: > >>On December 15, 2003 at 13:58:02, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>Number of tests: 183 >>>Max score: 183 >>>Engines score: 165 >>>Number with full score: 165 >>>Found in: 1 sec = 28, 2 sec = 11, 5 sec = 29, 10 sec = 20, 30 sec = 30, 1 min = >>>9, 2 min = 12, 5 min = 17, 10 min = 4, 30 min = 5, >>>Time used for tests (wrong answer=900s): 27361s >>> >>>Positions with error (id): >>>ECM.1068, ECM.1197, ECM.1204, ECM.1217, ECM.1227, >>>ECM.1229, ECM.1265, ECM.1273, ECM.1294, ECM.1308, ECM.1314, >>>ECM.1438, ECM.1533, ECM.1592, ECM.1612, ECM.1617, ECM.1621, >>>ECM.1622 >> >>BTW, how do you get these results? i use crafty 19.06 within arena on an athlon >>XP1600+, and when i run ECMGCP at 5 seconds per move arena tells me that crafty >>solves 91 of 183 positions. is there any difference to 19.07? what are you using >>to run the EPD? > >Your machine is much faster than the one that I used. > >I am using gradualtest. hi dann, finally i understand your results - sorry for the last confused post. so basically you're saying you have 68 solved after 5 seconds, right? i ran crafty 19.06, ruffian 1.0.5 and my thing at 5s/move on my XP1600+ on ECMGCP, and the result is muse 0.877 86/183 crafty 19.06 91/183 ruffian 1.05 114/183 i must admit that i have a bit a speculative king safety eval which helps me get a good score compared to crafty; crafty is much stronger than my engine for other reasons. in any case, i don't believe that crafty 19.07 is a tactical monster as you claim, there is no difference to 19.06 AFAIK except that you compiled with detect draw, which may help but only in a handful of positions. ruffian solves much more than crafty. cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.