Author: martin fierz
Date: 00:24:37 12/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2003 at 02:26:09, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 16, 2003 at 01:51:57, martin fierz wrote: > >>On December 15, 2003 at 16:09:44, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On December 15, 2003 at 16:01:17, martin fierz wrote: >>> >>>>On December 15, 2003 at 13:58:02, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>> >>>>>Number of tests: 183 >>>>>Max score: 183 >>>>>Engines score: 165 >>>>>Number with full score: 165 >>>>>Found in: 1 sec = 28, 2 sec = 11, 5 sec = 29, 10 sec = 20, 30 sec = 30, 1 min = >>>>>9, 2 min = 12, 5 min = 17, 10 min = 4, 30 min = 5, >>>>>Time used for tests (wrong answer=900s): 27361s >>>>> >>>>>Positions with error (id): >>>>>ECM.1068, ECM.1197, ECM.1204, ECM.1217, ECM.1227, >>>>>ECM.1229, ECM.1265, ECM.1273, ECM.1294, ECM.1308, ECM.1314, >>>>>ECM.1438, ECM.1533, ECM.1592, ECM.1612, ECM.1617, ECM.1621, >>>>>ECM.1622 >>>> >>>>BTW, how do you get these results? i use crafty 19.06 within arena on an athlon >>>>XP1600+, and when i run ECMGCP at 5 seconds per move arena tells me that crafty >>>>solves 91 of 183 positions. is there any difference to 19.07? what are you using >>>>to run the EPD? >>> >>>Your machine is much faster than the one that I used. >>> >>>I am using gradualtest. >> >>hi dann, >>finally i understand your results - sorry for the last confused post. >>so basically you're saying you have 68 solved after 5 seconds, right? >> >>i ran crafty 19.06, ruffian 1.0.5 and my thing at 5s/move on my XP1600+ on >>ECMGCP, and the result is >> >>muse 0.877 86/183 >>crafty 19.06 91/183 >>ruffian 1.05 114/183 >> >>i must admit that i have a bit a speculative king safety eval which helps me get >>a good score compared to crafty; crafty is much stronger than my engine for >>other reasons. >> >>in any case, i don't believe that crafty 19.07 is a tactical monster as you >>claim, there is no difference to 19.06 AFAIK except that you compiled with >>detect draw, which may help but only in a handful of positions. ruffian solves >>much more than crafty. >> >>cheers >> martin > >The question is if there is an improvement relative to previous versions of >crafty and not if it is stronger than other programs. no, not only: dann was very very impressed about crafty 19.07 and it's WAC score, and believes that crafty is a tactical monster. so i post this result so that he can reconsider :-) of course, normally you are right, you have to compare with older versions. cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.