Author: martin fierz
Date: 04:23:46 12/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 2003 at 07:13:46, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 16, 2003 at 06:12:18, Amir Ban wrote: > >>On December 15, 2003 at 20:31:29, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>Did you think you'd be playing this many games?! ;) >>> >>>I am sooo tempted to do my 'own' version of the Berger challenge!! >>> >> >>There is still the 100:1 challenge to be played. Are you volunteering ? >> >>Anyone else ? >> >>This will be a slower affair. I would like Junior to have the equivalent of >>30min/game on decent hardware, so maybe 25+10 vs. 2500+1000. 10 games should >>take about 2 weeks. >> >>If you have a dual, it will take half the time, or maybe play twice the games. > >I guess ponder is off(otherwise you can ponder on more than one move of the >opponent). > >> >>I think it should be played with books, but if there is objection to that, I'm >>ok with symmetric positions that are not too deep in the game. >> >>I'm thinking end of January. I may put up a beta version, and Bob should also >>have time to put up a "best and final version". >> >>Amir > >based on peter's result it seems that Junior8 has problems to win even with 10:1 >speed handicap so it seems that Crafty is a clear favourite unless you >improved Junior8 by more than 150 elo. > >Uri i believe this depends on the rate of play. at blitz time controls, i would expect 10/100 : 1 to be much more important than at long time controls. that would be another experiment to do :-) cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.