Author: Ralph E. Carter
Date: 13:50:50 11/22/98
Go up one level in this thread
Dlugy(* GM)[214] kibitzes: 25. Why do you think Deep Blue might have had human assistance in your match? (submitted by: SlobDefense) Kasparov(GM)[214] kibitzes: Simply because in game 2 machine did something which contradicted any conventianal knowledge of the computer's ability. There were a few other moments in the match I would like to get clarification on , but as we know refused to release printouts of the machine's thinking and lately event dismant Kasparov(GM)[214] kibitzes: even dismantled Deep Blue Kasparov(GM)[214] kibitzes: Infact the destroyed the only impartial witness. Kasparov(GM)[214] kibitzes: I dont think that further discussion of my word versus their word makes any sense Kasparov(GM)[214] kibitzes: Its up to IBM to give sufficient documentation for everybody to analyze to determine whether my claim was a sound one.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.