Author: Thomas Mayer
Date: 15:38:22 12/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Frank, >With "Today" I meaning available engines and we can start a tournament every >time with the WB engines which are available and which you like and I am >absolutly sure that Ruffian 2.0.0 will win. I am speaking from a tournament with >minimal 8 engines and minimal 20 games for every eng-eng match! > >You are ready to start such a tournament on your system ... >I am ready to start! that would also not proof anything -> then you can just say it had won that tourney... to be strongest is nothing objective. From what view ? I can give you several positions where e.g. Quark would have better results then Ruffian - so I can say that Quark is better in THOSE positions - which is objectively right and proofable for everybody. So it would be definitely better to advertise Ruffian as one of the strongest winboard engines in the world, winning Dutch Open 2003 ahead X,Y & Z, winning CCT5 ahead A, B & C etc. etc., being highest rated winboard engine at current SSDF list... That ALL would be correct. What do you think would Ossi Weiner have done with ChessBase if they would have ever claimed Fritz as the strongest engine in the world ? And vice versa ? Greets, Thomas
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.