Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 01:24:48 12/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 17, 2003 at 18:38:22, Thomas Mayer wrote: >Hi Frank, > >>With "Today" I meaning available engines and we can start a tournament every >>time with the WB engines which are available and which you like and I am >>absolutly sure that Ruffian 2.0.0 will win. I am speaking from a tournament with >>minimal 8 engines and minimal 20 games for every eng-eng match! >> >>You are ready to start such a tournament on your system ... >>I am ready to start! > >that would also not proof anything -> then you can just say it had won that >tourney... to be strongest is nothing objective. From what view ? I can give you >several positions where e.g. Quark would have better results then Ruffian - so I >can say that Quark is better in THOSE positions - which is objectively right and >proofable for everybody. >So it would be definitely better to advertise Ruffian as one of the strongest >winboard engines in the world, winning Dutch Open 2003 ahead X,Y & Z, winning >CCT5 ahead A, B & C etc. etc., being highest rated winboard engine at current >SSDF list... That ALL would be correct. >What do you think would Ossi Weiner have done with ChessBase if they would have >ever claimed Fritz as the strongest engine in the world ? And vice versa ? If Ossi was still around Frank probably would already have a registered letter on his desk. My best, Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.