Author: Komputer Korner
Date: 21:43:01 11/22/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 22, 1998 at 17:52:45, Lawrence S. Tamarkin wrote: >I think Kasparov is SO WRONG! - I've spent my whole life trying to become even >slightly good at chess in its traditional form, and now this World Champion >tells me other ways of shuffling the pieces and playing with a computer on the >side will become the way to go. I say, NO'oo > >Fortaunately, there is some evidence that chess will continue to be enjoyed, >played, and improved on, just the way it is. In the 1920's, when Capablanca was >experimenting on a board with 10 squares across and some extra, different >pieces, and declared that chess was played out in the traditional way, Alekhine >came along to take away his title, and infuse new 'energy' into the game as it >was then. (What ever became of this 10 square board game, anyway?). > >Today, Even though we have Shuffle Chess, Advanced Chess, Chess by email, Chess >against the computer, Chess with the computer, and 'pronouncements', by Kasparov >about how these other forms (I don't argue that they are fun, only that they can >assume greater importance than 'traditional chess'), will take the game in a >'needed' new direction. I argue that this is just not true. > >Kasparov, like Capablanca is at the very top. The difference this time is that >instead of there being just one guy (Alekhine), to take regular traditional >chess to new levels, there are several, (Kramnik, Shirov, Ivanchuk, Gelfand, >Morozivich, and Polgar's among them), who are making normal chess as exciting as >its ever been. > >mrslug - the inkompetent chess software addict! > > >On November 22, 1998 at 16:45:00, Ralph E. Carter wrote: > >>Dlugy(* GM)[214] kibitzes: 21. How do you see the future of chess? (submitted >>by: Alphachess & Polterguest) >>Kasparov(GM)[214] kibitzes: Computers will play more and more important role and >>I think that the form I call Advanced Chess ( MAN + MACHINE) will become popular >>in the 21st century. >>Kasparov(GM)[214] kibitzes: I also think the idea to reshuffle pieces in the >>opening position will get substantial support in the future. >>Kasparov(GM)[214] kibitzes: Also Internet will become the most important arena >>for chess competitions including high level professional chess. While I agree that opening tradition and study is satisfying in itself, perhaps Gary is suffering from opening study fatigue. To stay at the top in chess requires an enormous amount of opening study. In essence it is a constant repertoire correspondence workload that never ends, thus the point of Fischer Random/Shuffle chess. However I think chess would lose a lot of glamour from the loss of opening theory. It is the one cord that connects us patzers with the GMs. By studying opening theory us patzers can play GM like moves at the beginning and we can develop intense interest in games that fit our repertoires. -- Komputer Korner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.