Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Ruffian discuss ...

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 02:06:23 12/18/03

Go up one level in this thread


On December 18, 2003 at 04:51:56, Frank Quisinsky wrote:

>Hi there,
>
>I don't like negative publicity about my first product.
>Negative publicity is a good publicitiy too but I don't like it.
>I have more interest to make a good publicity for my first product!
>
>In this case it's better we closed the discuss here because I like it to for
>sell 100 CDs with positiv publicity compare to for sell 1 CD with negative
>publicity.
>
>This is not in my interest!

I agree Frank. I felt that your statements were not right and thus
I reacted, maybe a bit too strongly but such is my nature.

I do not feel that the way you are advertising Ruffian 2.0 is right
or even legal, and several people pointed this out to you as well,
but whether you take up the advice is up to you.

I have *no* intent of making life difficult for you or for your new
company and certainly not for Mr. Valfridsson, which is why I preferred
having a (even if somewhat heated) discussion here rather than via
registered letters.

I hope that you now understand the issues and are somewhat more
carefull with the distinction between fact & opinion in the future.

Good luck with Ruffian 2.0,
Gian-Carlo Pascutto



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.