Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 04:19:20 12/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 18, 2003 at 04:59:58, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >my English is not good enough and I say it ... maybe I make no mistakes! > >I cann't write other information on my handbook as I have and I sure with my >words. This is not a question of English but simply of bad reflection of the case and its factors. Your logic is ok as you can't write other information as you have! But not all the information you _have_ can be written on the PR text or the box of your product. I thought that this is a trivial fact. You argue as if it were the responsibility of your business partners to prove you wrong with your test results. But as others already said, your own results can't hold the water you want to imply. And that is your problem in case of court cases. Then you can only claim innocence because of your lack of statistical knowledge. But that is only to prevent _higher_ punishments, the case is lost in any case and you must pay. Not that anybody here would want to sue you at this stage of your project. But if you have success, and that is a wish from all here, then this idea of involving lawyers could be reanimated. Your basic problem, yes, is that you are _still_ too honest. All you have to do is finding a good result, and there are enough, and then saying that there Ruffian was the best on place one. By all means you must find such a first place. Nothing has changed indeed, but juridically you are aus dem Schneider. So, you don't reflect anylonger what good results your partners have with their programs, it is also not the question if you are really stronger than them, but the only topic that should interest you is where Ruffian got number one places. Wch or the SSDF are always a good address for the average chessplayer. I'm sorry, but Leiden etc pp is not so famous outside the core of some experts. So, where is Ruffian otherwise the best on place one? A feature? Speed? Its style? Just ask your creative doctors... But forget about the usual style in forum debates - there of course you can win many debates with basically weak arguments. But in business you can't rely on such things. You can't even trust your first lawyer. Perhaps he's uninformed and another one is way better. In case you dont obey, I will condemn you to three orange cards with a timely red card over the weekend and a star for inexperience for the next decade. I will stop all testing and other spare time hobbies and I will concentrate myself on -- [sorry, but here my keyboard had an accident and I couldn't make progress in this fundamental message!] I hope that the sentence with the cards came through. Orange! 1x Red! Moderators please read again and oops, I forgot to set the icon :) Hope this helps. Just ignore the thousands of complaints. Please ask me if you can't understand my _German_ text!! Rolf >You can be sure that I have changed this text on the handbook if I saw >that people have a problem with it. Now it's too late for changed it and I saw >no reason to changed it after the 4 weeks available PDF on Arena webpages. > >I know that Rebel, TheKing and Sjeng are very strong too and i like this >programs very much but I have no other results. Only one other results (tourney >with different engines and much games) and I have not write this on my handbook >... but I don't have it. > >Ed speaking from Ossi Weiner. >I know Ossi Weiner, I work on his webpages :-) > >Ossi Weiner is a very good buiseness man and I am very interested in the opinion >from Ossi about this topic. Maybe I will write Ossi in the evening a short mail. > >Best >Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.