Author: martin fierz
Date: 09:27:14 12/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 18, 2003 at 09:41:53, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>Basically, I disagree with the reasoning that lead the ICGA to the decision, >>but I disagree with all people that think the decision was unreasonable. > > >That is simply an impossible statement to understand. this is so simple to understand that it's impossible to understand that you don't understand it :-) we're back to logic class: "bad reasoning A leading to some decision X" does not mean "decision X is unreasonable". BTW, the arbiter's decision is always final in *lots* of activities, e.g. in most team sports. it can be wrong, but it's the arbiter's decision. you have to live with it... cheers martin
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.