Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Bigger hash really better?

Author: Slater Wold

Date: 23:05:44 12/18/03

Go up one level in this thread


On December 19, 2003 at 01:37:29, Wayne Lowrance wrote:

>On December 19, 2003 at 01:28:35, Slater Wold wrote:
>
>>On December 19, 2003 at 01:21:45, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>
>>>After installing more RAM to my Pentium 2,4 GHz I tested Fritz8 in some test
>>>suites with 128MB and 384MB hash (time limit was 10 minutes and positions quite
>>>hard = average solution times around 3-5 minutes): to my surprise
>>>average solution time was shorter with 128MB! Why? Absolutely no hard disk
>>>swapping with 512MB total RAM!
>>>
>>>Jouni
>>
>>Windows is kinda crappy here...
>>
>>I watched Bob go from 384MB to 4096MB hash the other nite, and his NPS did _NOT_
>>slow down.  Not even a FRACTION of a percent.  Of course, he was running SuSe
>>(Linux).
>>
>>In Windows, that isn't going to happen.  Every single time you edge your hash
>>up, you'll probably see a slowing down of NPS.  Why?  Swapping.  Windows does
>>*too* much of it.
>>
>>Turn your swap file off, and see what happens.  ;)
>
>please explain this swapping.
>Thank you

http://aumha.org/win5/a/xpvm.php


Do this test (on 2K & XP).

Close everything possible.
Run Task Manager, and look at your PF Usage (page file).
Open Crafty, Fritz, whatever, and use 50% of your total physical memory.
Now look at your PF usage.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.