Author: Bernhard Bauer
Date: 23:23:19 12/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 18, 2003 at 15:02:31, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On December 18, 2003 at 14:09:31, Jonas Bylund wrote: > >>On December 18, 2003 at 12:56:00, Richard Sutherland wrote: >> >>>On December 18, 2003 at 06:10:23, Jonas Bylund wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>Well Frank was only excersising his rights to free speech, the way i see it you >>>>are the one trying to limit freedom of speech here, you used the word "request" >>>>yourself... >>>> >>>>I know Frank as an honest intelligent person who loves computer chess enough to >>>>have trough many years given us many great (free) services, this is not someone >>>>i would personally ask to "go away" as you so elequently put it. >>>> >>>>I can understand that he does not want to continue a discussion that seems to >>>>lead nowhere, especially when it could potentially be bad for business (for the >>>>wrong reasons if you ask me). >>>> >>>>Like i have said before: >>>>Thank you Frank for your great contributions to computer chess! >>>> >>>>Regards >>>>Jonas >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>Get real Jonas. Anytime someone domes on a board and says "Stop criticizing my >>>product, even if it is a rip-off, because it will cost me money" >> >>If you going to quote someone you should actually quote them and not post your >>own fables, talk about getting real! >> >>they should >>>expect to be hammered. (Take note: I'm not saying that this product is a >>>rip-off, just that that is the way it came out). >> >>Wow that must be the least thought through statement in CCC history. >> >>>Personally, I think Ruffian is overpriced for a product that has not established >>>itself yet but that is his prerogative to charge whatever he wants. Unlike some >>>here, who buy every chess program, regardless of cost, I have to be a little >>>more selective and Frank's post has put me right off this program. >> >>What you think personally is your opinion and you have the right to say what is >>on you mind, just like Frank has. I am not saying that i would do the same, but >>i have no problem with him saying what he did, that is the point i am making >>here. >> >>Regards >>Jonas > >Hi Jonas, > >thanks for your helps!! > >With this posting I will say only that the complete team have no interest to >make money with negative publicity. I am sure we don't know negative publicity >for our product. Nice to see that you understand my posting. I have never say >"please closed this thread". It's not my forum and I am guest here. > You wrote: -->In this case it's better we closed the discuss here because I like it to for -->sell 100 CDs with positiv publicity compare to for sell 1 CD with negative -->publicity. You may write your opinion here just like any other person. But closing discussion is not up to you so please refrain from even suggesting this. >The opinions from a group of persons are very interesting for me. I cann`t know >what I read in different messages but this discuss are normaly for bigger chess >fora. Unfortunately, the most negative opinions comes allways from the same >group of persons. Not important is what I do, important is that Frank do it. > I simply don't get it. May be you should explain it in German. >But I am very happy / proud about my first project. It looks nice good and all >persons which help me made a great work. > >Per-Ola and Martin are great programmers and the chess computer world have a new >event. > >Best >Frank Arena is a good piece of software and ruffian_1 too. We will see how good ruffian_2 really is after it is shipped. My best wishes for arena and ruffian. regards Bernhard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.