Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 08:48:14 12/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2003 at 10:58:14, Robert Hyatt wrote: >There is more to it than that. The final decision was _clearly_ wrong if all >that is considered is the written rules. So either other reasons were good >enough to violate a written rule, or the decision to violate the written rules >was simply wrong. Yes, "other reasons..". >He didn't agree with any of the reasoning used to violate tournament rules. >Therefore, how could one agree with a decision that directly violates rules >being used? I guess he felt there were other reasons which could justify the decision. But don't come to me for elaboration of those, I don't agree with them :) -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.