Author: Sedat
Date: 10:34:28 12/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2003 at 10:42:00, pablinhoz wrote:
>
> The fact that cm gladiator didn't lose a single minimatch is interesting, but
>i don't expect it can hold the rating in a test with slower time control, though
>i hope i'm wrong :-)
>
> Anyway, cm9000 is therefore the strongest engine for blitz with the gladiator
>setting, have you tested the default settings of the king3.23? i don't see it in
>the table...
>
> Finally, i only saw deep fritz 8 tested on blitz ratings, are you going to
>test it with more time in each game? Greetings
>
>
>
Pablo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1.If you have any suspicions about the strenght of CM9 Gladiator please download
the games , analyse them...dont forget its only 200 games
- If you want to see the performance of the new settings here is download link:
http://www.geocities.com/sedatchess/CM9_Gladiator.zip
2.To test the default settings of the king 3.23 -everybody know that they are
not so strong...why to lose time ?!
3.Finaly-wait a little bit ,after 2-3 weeks you will see Deep Fritz 8 in my
Ratinglist-40 moves in 40 min
Regards,
Sedat Canbaz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.