Author: George Sobala
Date: 14:49:10 12/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2003 at 17:19:21, martin fierz wrote: >On December 19, 2003 at 16:36:54, George Sobala wrote: > >>Nxf8 was played in one correspondence game, and White won. >> >>[Event "corr."] >>[Site "Finland"] >>[Date "1986"] >>[Round ""] >>[White "Plank Gosta"] >>[Black "Viinikka Yrjo"] >>[Result "1-0"] >>[Eco "C34"] >>[Annotator ""] >>[Source ""] >> >>1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 d6 4.Bc4 h6 5.d4 g5 6.O-O Bg7 7.c3 Nf6 >>8.e5 dxe5 9.Qb3 O-O 10.Nxe5 Qe8 11.Ng6 b5 12.Bxb5 Qe4 13.Nxf8 >>Bb7 14.Rf2 Ng4 15.Re2 Bxd4+ 16.cxd4 Qxd4+ 17.Kf1 Nxh2+ 18.Ke1 >>f3 19.Be3 Qd6 20.Rf2 g4 21.Nd2 Nc6 22.Ne4 Qxf8 23.Nf6+ Kg7 24.Nh5+ >>Kg8 25.g3 1-0 > >oh, i don't have that game in megabase 2003. where do you have it from, >megacorr? I found it in Chess Assistant 7's HugeBase > >as you can see, the fritz/me combination suggests 18...Qg1+ 19.Kd2 f3 as an >improvement over this game. fritz assesses the position at that point (after >19....f3) as slightly favorable for white after a few minutes thought on my P4 >1.4GHz (+0.88), but given white's huge material advantage, that just means it's >completely unclear. and when you play out the moves given in my post, the score >just keeps dropping from white's point of view. > >of course, in 1986 they didn't have fritz 7 :-) > >anyway, it's certainly not a blunder in NCO, but just one of those positions >that are too deep for the beasts. > >cheers > martin Rebel-12 also suggests 18...Qg1+ 19.Kd2 f3, I am going to let it think over the subsequent position overnight! It is certainly a wild position, way beyond these so-called tactical monsters.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.