Author: Chessfun
Date: 21:52:01 12/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2003 at 06:21:26, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >First of all, this very laudable description of Ruffian 2.0 was not produced by >Per-Ola. Per-Ola actually wrote in his text that Ruffian is "a strong Winboard >and UCI engine", nothing more. Thus, I agree with many of you who thought that >the wording was too pompous (to say the least). Then why had you never mentioned it to Frank, as part of the Ruffian team?. >As for the third program that was also mentioned as a strong WB engine, Deep >Sjeng 1.5, I have my own testing evidence, which I will be bold enough to >present to you (I will not supply the games as I have pitted Ruffian and DS >purely for my investigative purposes; to find out if there are any >vulnerabilities in the Noomen book). My evidence comprises more than 1,000 >games played at G/5, G/10, G/15, G/30, G/45, played on a dual AMD MP system (MP >2000+, 1 GB RAM, Windows XP Pro, hash 128 MB each, 3-4-5 tablebases included). In recent posting if I recall correctly you stated you didn't have Deep Sjeng 1.5 but rather a previous beta version?. >Again, I am sorry that the ad came out the way it did, and I am also rather sad >at the fact that I was not around to try and reply to some well-founded >criticism directed at Frank Quisinsky. I think that Frank was well-intentioned >but also that he has to learn a lot about the ways of the world, especially the >world of business. Frank complained in quite a few posts that he wrote and posted it 4 weeks ago and none mentioned it till now. Did you never see it?, as part of the team wasn't you given a copy of the add?. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.