Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 17:24:33 12/20/03
WM-Test-Match, Ruffian 2.0.0 vs. Shredder 7.04 !
Now 2,5 – 2,5 and a fantastical game in Round 5!
More about the WM-Test suite read here:
http://www.f22.parsimony.net/forum41668/messages/27785.htm
Hardware = P600E
PB = Off
Hash = 64 Mb, 64 Mb
TBs = Off
Stufe = 30 Min. Aktivschach
[Event "P600, Stufe = 30'"]
[Site "Privat"]
[Date "2003.??.??"]
[Round "4"]
[White "Ruffian 2.0.0"]
[Black "Shredder 7.04"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "C98"]
[Annotator "Nemeth"]
[PlyCount "171"]
[EventDate "2003.??.??"]
{W=13.2 ply; 379kN/s B=12.8 ply; 139kN/s} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4
Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. c3 d6 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 c5 11. d4 Qc7
12. Nbd2 Nc6 {Beide letzter Buchzug} 13. d5 {-0.08/13 73} Na5 {0.19/12 33} 14.
b3 {(Sf1) -0.05/13 69} Bd7 {0.14/12 31} 15. Nf1 {(Lb2) 0.01/12 57} Qb6 {
(Sb7) 0.31/12 101} 16. Be3 {(Sg3) 0.05/12 52} Nb7 {(Dc7) 0.42/12 55} 17. Ng3 {
0.05/11 33 Auch Ruffian 2.0.0 baut sich solide auf.} Qa5 {0.50/11 41} 18. a3 {
(Dd2) 0.08/11 35} Qc7 {(Tab8) 0.48/12 269} 19. a4 {(Sh4) 0.11/12 52} Na5 {
0.43/11 59} 20. axb5 {0.06/11 29} axb5 {0.78/10 9} 21. Ra2 {(Sh4) 0.10/10 28}
Nb7 {(Tfc8) 0.36/11 35} 22. Qa1 {0.21/13 28} Rxa2 {(Ta5) 0.52/12 75} 23. Qxa2 {
0.45/12 20} Rb8 {(b4) 0.54/11 37} 24. Ra1 {0.44/11 27} Rc8 {(Ld8) 0.59/11 24}
25. Bd3 {(Da6) 0.55/12 35} Bd8 {(b4) 0.68/11 34} 26. b4 {0.62/12 42} Be7 {
(c4) 0.84/11 29} 27. Qa7 {(Da6) 0.59/12 62} Bd8 {(cxb4) 0.91/11 35} 28. bxc5 {
(Ta6) 1.07/11 32} Nxc5 {1.09/11 33} 29. Qxc7 {0.73/14 45} Rxc7 {1.25/13 18} 30.
Bxb5 {(Lxc5) 0.72/14 32} Bxb5 {1.15/13 25} 31. Bxc5 {0.73/13 8} Rxc5 {
0.87/14 21} 32. Ra8 {0.70/13 9 und Ruffian hat wieder klaren positionellen
Vorteil, oder etwa nicht? Doch. Wann faellt nur das erste Tor, das ist die
Frage?} Kf8 {0.79/13 18} 33. Rxd8+ {0.73/12 7} Ke7 {0.83/14 20} 34. Ra8 {
0.72/14 41} g6 {(Ld7) 0.71/13 20} 35. Ra5 {(Ta3) 0.76/13 35} Nd7 {0.66/13 18}
36. Ra3 {0.71/13 26} Rc7 {(f5) 0.76/13 26} 37. Nd2 {0.69/14 25} Bd3 {0.66/14 21
} 38. f3 {0.63/14 41} f5 {(Sc5) 0.65/13 19} 39. exf5 {(Kf2) 0.74/14 26} gxf5 {
0.67/11 4} 40. f4 {0.74/14 33} Kf6 {(Tb7) 0.73/11 25} 41. Nh5+ {
(Sf3) 0.96/12 32} Kg6 {0.69/13 26} 42. g4 {0.90/13 31} fxg4 {(e4) 0.70/12 16}
43. hxg4 {0.88/11 8} Be2 {(Kf7) 0.91/12 19} 44. f5+ {1.04/13 22} Kh6 {
1.14/12 15} 45. Ng3 {(Se4) 1.19/14 14} Bxg4 {1.34/13 15} 46. Nde4 {
1.24/14 25 Es ist nun zuwenig Material auf dem Brett.} Nc5 {(Sb6) 1.12/12 11}
47. Nxd6 {1.57/14 21} Rd7 {1.09/13 19} 48. Ra5 {1.35/15 28} Rxd6 {1.02/14 14}
49. Rxc5 {1.04/14 25} Rd8 {1.08/13 14} 50. Kf2 {(c4) 1.15/13 13} Kg5 {0.80/11 4
} 51. Ke3 {1.33/13 18} Bxf5 {1.11/12 13} 52. Ne4+ {(c4) 1.23/12 22} Kg6 {
1.02/12 11} 53. Rc6+ {(c4) 1.25/13 22} Kg7 {1.02/12 6} 54. Rc7+ {
(c4) 1.32/13 20} Kg6 {1.29/14 32} 55. c4 {1.34/13 10} h5 {(Ta8) 1.53/13 38} 56.
Rc6+ {1.66/13 17} Kg7 {1.29/13 12} 57. Nd6 {1.22/15 113} Bg6 {1.38/12 16} 58.
Rc7+ {(Ta6) 1.37/13 32} Kf6 {(Kh6) 1.31/11 5} 59. Nb7 {2.38/13 7} Ra8 {
2.71/14 41} 60. d6 {2.36/12 4} Ra3+ {2.58/13 26} 61. Kf2 {2.57/12 9} Ra2+ {
2.49/12 14} 62. Ke1 {2.51/12 3} Be8 {(Lf5) 2.63/12 8} 63. d7 {2.38/11 11} Bxd7
{2.68/12 5} 64. Rxd7 {2.31/12 6} h4 {2.70/11 10} 65. Rh7 {(Td3) 2.37/12 6} Ra7
{2.71/13 9} 66. Kf2 {2.51/12 7 Haette Ruffian das hier mit den Tablebases noch
gewonnen, das ist nur die einzige Frage? Ich denke, es ist leider nur Remis
wieder.} Kg6 {(e4) 2.91/12 11} 67. Rd7 {2.60/11 6} Ra3 {(Ta2+) 3.07/11 17} 68.
c5 {(Td1) 2.89/10 5} Rc3 {2.88/11 16} 69. Kg2 {(Ke2) 2.92/10 6} h3+ {
(e4) 2.28/11 9} 70. Kh2 {(Kg1) 3.13/12 5} Kh5 {(Kf5) 1.76/12 6} 71. Rd2 {
(Tg7) 1.40/16 61} Kg4 {
1.48/13 3 Shredder der Endspielkuenstler rettet sich wieder einmal ins Remis.}
72. Re2 {0.88/17 46} Rc4 {0.74/13 6} 73. Rb2 {(Ta2) 0.87/14 4} e4 {0.74/13 1}
74. Nd6 {0.87/13 6} Rxc5 {0.74/13 4} 75. Nxe4 {0.92/13 3} Re5 {3.62/13 11} 76.
Ng3 {0.93/13 4} Re8 {(Te7) 3.83/14 9} 77. Rb4+ {0.93/12 3} Kf3 {3.84/14 5} 78.
Rh4 {0.93/12 3} Rg8 {3.90/13 8} 79. Rxh3 {0.99/12 5} Ke3 {(Tf8) 0.85/12 13} 80.
Kg2 {(Th5) 1.09/12 4} Rf8 {(Tg6) 0.81/11 6} 81. Nh1+ {(Sf5+) 1.18/12 3} Kd4 {
0.81/13 5} 82. Nf2 {(Th7) 1.17/13 3} Rf7 {0.81/11 4} 83. Rh4+ {(Th5) 1.19/13 4}
Kd5 {(Kc3) 0.82/13 7} 84. Kg3 {1.22/11 2} Ra7 {(Ke5) 0.85/13 7} 85. Kf3 {
(Sd1) 1.31/12 2} Ra3+ {0.82/12 8} 86. Ke2 {adjud. (Kg2) Remis angenommen 1.33/
12 4 Hier habe ich abgebrochen, denn die Stellung ist Remis. Dennoch: wieder
haben wir eine hevorragende Darbietung von Ruffian gesehen, man kann bisher
mit dem neuen Programm sehr zufrieden sein daher.} 1/2-1/2
In Round 5 you can see fantastical moves:
[Event "P600, Stufe = 30' "]
[Site "Privat"]
[Date "2003.??.??"]
[Round "5"]
[White "Shredder 7.04"]
[Black "Ruffian 2.0.0"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "B85"]
[PlyCount "208"]
[EventDate "2003.??.??"]
{W=11.2 ply; 137kN/s B=11.2 ply; 377kN/s} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4.
Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Be2 e6 7. O-O Be7 8. f4 O-O 9. Kh1 Qc7 10. a4 Nc6 11. Be3
Re8 12. Bf3 Rb8 {Beide letzter Buchzug} 13. Qe1 {0.13/10 49 Endlich wird es
etwas schaerfer und Shredder spielt meiner Meinung nach, hier den besten Zug.}
e5 {(Sa5) -0.07/12 72} 14. Nde2 {0.25/12 54} exf4 {(Sb4) -0.13/12 69} 15. Nxf4
{0.59/12 27} Ne5 {-0.10/12 66} 16. Qg3 {(De2) 0.53/11 34} Qd8 {
(Sxf3) -0.09/10 45} 17. Ba7 {(a5) 0.26/10 34} Ra8 {-0.19/12 39} 18. Bf2 {
0.27/11 34} Nfg4 {-0.11/11 51} 19. Bxg4 {0.41/11 32} Nxg4 {(Lxg4) -0.02/12 58}
20. Nfd5 {(Scd5) 0.57/11 36} Nxf2+ {-0.11/12 39} 21. Qxf2 {0.48/13 20} Be6 {
0.01/13 54} 22. Rad1 {0.48/11 47} Rc8 {(Lh4) 0.00/12 34} 23. Qa7 {0.64/11 37}
Rb8 {-0.02/12 51} 24. Nxe7+ {0.44/11 48 Endlich geht es zur Sache, doch ich
meine dass Nxe7 hier nicht die beste Fortsetzung ist.} Qxe7 {-0.02/12 26} 25.
Qb6 {(Dd4) 0.48/12 27} Rbd8 {(Ted8) -0.04/12 26} 26. Rd4 {0.44/12 41} Rd7 {
-0.08/13 47} 27. Kg1 {(Tfd1) 0.31/11 56} Rc8 {-0.18/11 35} 28. Rf2 {
(Td2) 0.22/11 47} Rc6 {(Dg5) -0.18/11 25} 29. Qa7 {(Da5) 0.16/10 7} Qe8 {
(f6) -0.21/11 22} 30. Rb4 {0.19/12 32} Qc8 {-0.23/12 29} 31. Qe3 {
(Dd4) 0.00/11 31} d5 {-0.20/11 28} 32. e5 {(Td2) 0.00/10 38} Rc4 {-0.41/12 26}
33. Rxc4 {0.00/13 50} Qxc4 {(dxc4) -0.48/12 19} 34. Qb6 {-0.34/13 56} d4 {
(h6) -0.44/12 23} 35. Ne4 {(Da7) -0.17/12 17} d3 {-0.40/12 20} 36. cxd3 {
-0.16/11 22} Rxd3 {-0.42/13 33} 37. Nc3 {-0.12/12 22} Rd7 {(h6) -0.42/13 35
Wieder ist das Spiel verflacht. Anscheinend kompensieren sich die beiden
staerksten positionellen Programme. Immerhin spielt Ruffian gegen die
derzeitige SSDF Nr.1 und das spricht deshalb fuer ihn.} 38. Rf3 {
(De3) -0.27/11 35} Qh4 {-0.44/10 17} 39. Qf2 {(De3) -0.25/11 20} Qd8 {
-0.53/11 17} 40. Qe3 {-0.46/12 37} Bc4 {(b6) -0.49/11 26} 41. Qc5 {-0.31/11 16}
Rd4 {-0.57/11 18} 42. a5 {(g3) -0.44/12 29} Be6 {-0.64/12 17} 43. Qa7 {
(Tf2) -0.56/11 19} Rd2 {(h6) -0.65/10 15} 44. Rf2 {-0.48/10 12} Rxf2 {
(Td7) -1.07/11 24} 45. Kxf2 {-0.18/9 3} g6 {(h5) -1.00/11 45} 46. Qxb7 {
(De3) -0.37/12 23} Qd4+ {-1.03/11 14} 47. Kf1 {-0.40/12 19} Qf4+ {
(Lc4+) -1.17/11 20} 48. Qf3 {-0.40/12 17} Bc4+ {-1.12/11 9} 49. Ke1 {
(Kf2) -0.38/12 12} Qxh2 {(Dxe5+) -1.14/12 24 Die Partie ist Remis, normal,
aber es flogen dennoch bald die Fetzen und ich kam aus dem Staunen nicht
heraus!} 50. Qe4 {-0.41/12 23} Qg1+ {-1.20/12 23} 51. Kd2 {-0.41/7 0} Bb3 {
(Df2+) -1.21/12 22} 52. Qa8+ {-0.04/11 16} Kg7 {-0.50/3 0} 53. Qxa6 {
-0.04/11 15} Qxg2+ {-1.42/10 6} 54. Ke3 {(De2) -0.04/11 29} Qg3+ {
(Le6) -1.42/9 11} 55. Ke4 {-0.03/10 15} h5 {
(Dg4+) -1.38/9 11 Ruffian will gewinnen.} 56. Qf6+ {-0.02/9 15} Kg8 {
-1.28/10 16} 57. Kd4 {(a6) -0.02/10 14} Qg2 {(Dg1+) -1.64/11 11} 58. a6 {
(Kc5) -0.04/9 10} Qxb2 {-2.16/11 15} 59. Qf3 {-1.08/10 13} Qa1 {-2.34/10 11}
60. Qa8+ {(Dd3) -1.15/10 14} Kh7 {(Kg7) -2.67/11 11} 61. Qc6 {-1.06/10 14} Qg1+
{-2.58/10 14} 62. Kd3 {-1.37/10 11} Qg3+ {-2.44/10 20} 63. Kd4 {-1.58/11 20}
Qf2+ {-2.44/10 16} 64. Kd3 {-1.58/11 23} Bc2+ {-2.21/10 16} 65. Kc4 {-1.43/7 0}
Qf4+ {-2.11/10 15} 66. Kc5 {-1.43/11 21} Qxe5+ {(Ld3) -2.05/10 29} 67. Kb6 {
-1.24/10 11} Qb8+ {-2.05/10 8} 68. Qb7 {-0.99/10 8} Qd6+ {-0.15/13 78} 69. Qc6
{-0.36/11 12} Qd8+ {(Db4+) -0.15/11 6} 70. Qc7 {(Kb7) -0.28/10 9} Qd4+ {
-0.15/11 5 Ruffian sucht verzweifelt nach einem Gewinnweg, findet ihn jedoch
nicht.} 71. Qc5 {-0.04/11 8} Qg4 {0.00/11 9} 72. a7 {-0.04/10 10} Qe6+ {
(Le4) 0.00/12 7} 73. Qc6 {(Kb7) -0.01/12 7} Qe3+ {0.00/13 5} 74. Qc5 {
0.00/12 10} Qe8 {0.00/12 8 Nanu? Warum nicht wieder Qe6+! mit Zugwiderholung,
denn die Bewertung ist ja dieselbe? Warum so schnell einen anderen Zug spielen
und damit ein Risiko eingehen? Ich weiss es nicht.} 75. Qd5 {(Dc6) 0.21/11 6}
Qe3+ {0.03/11 4} 76. Kb7 {0.08/12 14} Qe7+ {0.07/11 4} 77. Ka6 {0.00/13 17}
Qa3+ {0.19/12 13} 78. Kb6 {0.07/13 15} Qb2+ {0.06/12 7} 79. Nb5 {0.04/13 8}
Qf6+ {0.08/12 5} 80. Qd6 {(Sd6) 0.04/13 14} Qf2+ {0.00/11 3} 81. Qd4 {0.05/12 8
} Qf3 {0.00/11 4} 82. Nd6 {(Sc3) 0.04/11 12} Bf5 {(Ld1) 0.15/10 15} 83. Ne8 {
(Sxf5) 0.52/9 7} Kh6 {0.00/10 6} 84. Qd2+ {1.06/10 19} Kh7 {0.00/11 6} 85. Nf6+
{0.42/10 15} Kg7 {0.00/10 6} 86. Qd4 {(Se8+) 0.32/10 7} Qb3+ {0.00/9 3} 87. Kc7
{(Kc6) 0.47/10 5} Qc2+ {0.00/10 5} 88. Kd6 {(Kb7) 0.46/10 3} Qc8 {0.00/10 4}
89. Nxh5+ {(Se8+) 0.37/9 6} Kh6 {-1.24/9 4} 90. Nf6 {(De3+) 0.61/9 5} Be6 {
(g5) 0.00/11 28} 91. Qd2+ {(Ke7) 1.16/8 10} g5 {0.00/10 2} 92. Qa5 {
(Dh2+) 1.24/9 7} Qa8 {0.00/10 4} 93. Ne4 {(Dc7) 1.04/9 9} f6 {(f5) 1.91/12 20}
94. Nxf6 {2.73/9 8} Kg6 {(Lf5) 3.63/12 15 Beide Programme sehen nun weiss klar
im Vorteil! Raecht sich nun, dass Ruffian die Zugwiederholung im Zug 74
verschmaeht hatte?} 95. Ke5 {2.95/10 8} Qf3 {(Dh8) 3.83/11 7} 96. a8=Q {
2.75/10 5 Ich komme aus dem Staunen nicht heraus! Weiss hat 2 Damen und
dennoch spielt man weiter.} Qxf6+ {3.83/8 2} 97. Ke4 {(Kd6) 2.75/9 7} (97. Kd6
Bg4+ 98. Kc7 Qf4+ 99. Kb6 Qd4+ 100. Qc5 Qb2+ $3 $11) 97... Qf4+ {3.01/7 2} 98.
Kd3 {2.74/7 0} Qc4+ {3.11/8 2} 99. Ke3 {(Kd2) 3.11/9 7} Qf4+ {3.18/8 2} 100.
Ke2 {2.90/9 4} Bc4+ {(Lg4+) 3.28/8 3} 101. Kd1 {-0.01/11 8} Bb3+ {3.35/8 2}
102. Ke2 {(Ke1) 0.00/10 2} Bc4+ {0.00/8 0} 103. Kd1 {-0.01/12 7} Bb3+ {0.00/8 0
} 104. Ke2 {(Ke1) 0.00/11 3} Bc4+ {Remis angenommen 0.00/9 0 Unglaublich!
Ruffian haelt mit Dame und Laeufer ein Remis. Eine fantastische Partie.}
1/2-1/2
After move 74 white:
Shredder 7.04 vs. Ruffian 2.0.0
Why played Ruffian 2.0.0 not again 74...Qe6+ with a draw (3x)?
[D]8/P4p1k/1K4p1/2Q4p/8/2N1q3/2b5/8 b - - 0 1
Endposition:
Shredder 7.04 vs. Ruffian 2.0.0
[D]Q7/8/6k1/Q5p1/2b2q2/8/4K3/8 w - - 0 1
Great and fantastical !
Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.