Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:57:07 12/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 21, 2003 at 03:52:44, Darse Billings wrote: <snipped> >Under the current format, the human operator is an integral part of >the game, and that has always been the case. Ultimately, this is >still a competition between *humans* -- the programmers. The role >of the operator is intended to be minimal, but it is not zero, nor >has it ever been. This is exactly the reason that the decision was wrong. The role of the operator is not minimal if we allow the operator to decide if to claim a draw or not to claim a draw in part of the cases. The role of the operator is smaller if we decide that the operator is forced to claim a draw in case that he is allowed to do it. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.