Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 02:35:42 12/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 21, 2003 at 05:31:12, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 21, 2003 at 05:08:48, Frank Phillips wrote: > >>Inbetween all the emotional clap-trap, the argument in your post seems to rest >>to a large degree on the assertion that the GUI was not part of the program, >>which you conveniently define it is not. I believe it clearly was part of the >>program and that therefore the claim of a draw (even though not precisely >>formulated, but obvious) was a 'move' that the operator had no right to >>over-rule. >> >>Whether or not the human can influence the contest, I suggest they should not to >>the extent that they change the result. > >It is impossible to prevent humans to change the result(for example speed of >operators may change the result) but the target should be to make the influence >as little as possible. > >Humans can influence the contest mean by definition that unfortunately they can >sometimes change the result(I am talking only about what happens during the >game). I guess the currect format simply dates back to the time before the internet and FICS servers. It's unfortunate it isn't be done a little more professional nowadays. -S. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.