Author: Thomas Mayer
Date: 18:29:48 12/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Rolf, >> at least you managed it somehow to put a smile on >> my face... thats a good start... :) > How could that happen? I feel unconfortable if you smile. :) but reading your statements I must LOL... > I like it when you are angry. :) Stop now... :) >>a) Zwanzger was not fully aware of that rule > That's the fault of Mr. Meyer-Kahlen! He had plenty of time to teach the > young guy about CC rules and other details. :) :) :) >> b) in trying to make everything correct he made a mistake. You understand >> me, a MISTAKE ! > Objection! Declined... :) >> He had never any bad intention to avoid the rule. Funny is, that you >> relate here bad intention with cheating. So what should I think now about >> your opinion about cheating ? :) > I am the twin of Uri, that is what you should think. Uri also combined bad > intentions and cheating. :) You missed the point - once you write that cheating must not have any bad intention and now you write to opposite... that is :))))) >> Well, and about Amir and the Fritz-team ? Should I force them to >> complain ???? >YESSSS! No... :) You would - but nobody would listen to you... :)) >> They must know themself what they do - and I am very sure that they know >> it, I have great respect for both. >You mean you respect their commercial experience? Nope - the persons themself. Like Bob, by the way... > Yes, let's better be cruel and misbehave. Stinkefinger!! Oh, you do the "Effenberg" -> now you will never play in the national team anymore ! :) Have you listen to "Hessi James" ? :))) >>Do you think your doctor did belong to an elite ? If yes, then okay, then we >>have a different opinion about elites. >What doctor? Take a look at your homepage - then you may have an idea what type of doctors I mean... > It's not about opinions but definitions regarding elites. I mean > duties not extra rights and impostering moves. So your definition is somehow different. Mine is more like "How you do" and not your "What you do"... of course this has nothing to do with extra rights and impostering moves... > Here in our case for example I have the duty to recognize that we are getting > off-topic since we agree in the basic question and that is the end of the > debate. ROTFL... :) >Please look out for another little war between us. Christmas is so boring. :) no chance - to much duties... And finally I fear that you are no opponent for me, you are so old. I only make war against the young, the most powerful and most experienced... :) OTOH this time it was worth it - having a good time is usually worth the effort... :) Greets, Thomas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.