Author: Slater Wold
Date: 20:03:40 12/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 21, 2003 at 22:43:31, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On December 21, 2003 at 16:25:22, Peter Berger wrote: > >>For information about setup and rules: >>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?336001 >> >>I always thought comments with hindsight are for whimps. >> >>Unfortunately this will make yours truly look a little silly - ah well. It's >>probably time to think about getting another commentator anyway. >> >>Junior, bold and stubborn, again decides to repeat the C92 line involving the >>rather pointless pawn sac discussed before. Crafty repeats the promising line >>from game 14. Junior varies with 29. Qh5 this time. Soon an equal position is >>reached as Crafty's initial inititative didn't bring up anything real. >> >>The operator, lazily thinking about doing the report about yet another C92 draw, >>enters the moves on the board, 59. ...c2 included, just to suddenly wake up. >>Isn't black maybe in serious trouble by now? >> >>With the queens trade at move 61 he thinks: not really. After all the rook pawn >>in this opposite bishops endgame has the wrong colour, no real danger at all. >> >>The rest is silence. Embarassing for humble me .. >> >>What to learn? Don't mess with the Israelian ex-worldchampion maybe? >> >>For the match itself it's certainly the most interesting result though, reaching >>the (rather unexpected here) climax. What will happen next ? Will the good >>professor really have to resign ? > > >I'm not sure what that means. :) (will the good professor really have to >resign?) You said that if Crafty didn't win this match, you should retire from computer chess all together. :)
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.