Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 21:08:09 12/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 21, 2003 at 23:03:40, Slater Wold wrote: >On December 21, 2003 at 22:43:31, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On December 21, 2003 at 16:25:22, Peter Berger wrote: >> >>>For information about setup and rules: >>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?336001 >>> >>>I always thought comments with hindsight are for whimps. >>> >>>Unfortunately this will make yours truly look a little silly - ah well. It's >>>probably time to think about getting another commentator anyway. >>> >>>Junior, bold and stubborn, again decides to repeat the C92 line involving the >>>rather pointless pawn sac discussed before. Crafty repeats the promising line >>>from game 14. Junior varies with 29. Qh5 this time. Soon an equal position is >>>reached as Crafty's initial inititative didn't bring up anything real. >>> >>>The operator, lazily thinking about doing the report about yet another C92 draw, >>>enters the moves on the board, 59. ...c2 included, just to suddenly wake up. >>>Isn't black maybe in serious trouble by now? >>> >>>With the queens trade at move 61 he thinks: not really. After all the rook pawn >>>in this opposite bishops endgame has the wrong colour, no real danger at all. >>> >>>The rest is silence. Embarassing for humble me .. >>> >>>What to learn? Don't mess with the Israelian ex-worldchampion maybe? >>> >>>For the match itself it's certainly the most interesting result though, reaching >>>the (rather unexpected here) climax. What will happen next ? Will the good >>>professor really have to resign ? >> >> >>I'm not sure what that means. :) (will the good professor really have to >>resign?) > >You said that if Crafty didn't win this match, you should retire from computer >chess all together. :) No. the 100:1 match. I didn't say much about this 8:1 or 10:1 stuff at all.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.