Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 21:20:35 12/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 22, 2003 at 00:12:21, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On December 21, 2003 at 23:50:44, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On December 21, 2003 at 23:36:05, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On December 21, 2003 at 14:08:48, Terry McCracken wrote: >>> >>>>On December 21, 2003 at 13:42:06, Andrew Dados wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 21, 2003 at 13:17:48, Terry McCracken wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On December 21, 2003 at 10:18:36, Mike Byrne wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On December 21, 2003 at 03:52:44, Darse Billings wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I have read the hundreds of replies in this thread. I don't read >>>>>>>>this forum regularly, and I do not wish to spark more pointless >>>>>>>>discussion (though it is likely inevitable). Nevertheless, many >>>>>>>>things have been said that are simply wrong, so I will try once >>>>>>>>more to clarify some of the points of contention. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>We heard your point of view and your point of view is in the minority and is >>>>>>>direct contradiction to "fair play" as most people know it. >>>>>> >>>>>>Then none of you have any idea whatsoever what fair play is. This comes as no >>>>>>surprise. >>>>>>> >>>>>>><big snip> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I have no intention of debating the issue further. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Bravo! We already went through this once, we will now have a another hundred >>>>>>>line thread on this issue . I think most people have already moved on and I'm >>>>>>>glad to see you are moving on as well. >>>>>>> >>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Michael >>>>>> >>>>>>No, he read a hundred rants from rash posters at CCC and is now responding, with >>>>>>intelligence, which is sorely lacking at CCC! >>>>> >>>>>You call arogance, insults and wishful thinking intelligence... wake up. >>>>>-Andrew- >>>> >>>>Oh, I'm awake alright. Thanks for accrediting my post. >>> >>> >>>Jeez. You are so "awake" you can't even recognize a put-down? >>> >>>:) >> >>You're an asshole, Hyatt! If it ever sinks into that neandertal skull, >>which it obviously won't, then you'll understand my belligerent response! >> >>Mr. Shrill! >> >>P.S. >> >>Get Lost! > >I expected no less from you. Thank you for not disappointing me. You're the one "lumbering" in here making snide ignorant comments, you deserved no less. Glad I could accommodate you. Please take the hint, I know it was a bit subtle for you, however I'm certain you'll disappoint me, sigh...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.