Author: Detlef Pordzik
Date: 16:47:15 11/23/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 23, 1998 at 18:54:20, blass uri wrote: > >On November 23, 1998 at 18:47:05, Detlef Pordzik wrote: > > >>Do you try this the other way round, too ? >>REBEL on 200 MMX ? JUNIOR on P 90 ? >>If yes, that's better, >>if no, what do you assume, is the worthy of such games, at all ? Using a new >>prog with newer algorithms, larger book and sure more hash tables - against an >>elder combattant, maybe with a much smaller, clearly elder book and less hash >>tables ? >>Not to speak of the PC version. I don't mind, if you have these 2, but it would >>be only fair to change machine every xyz games, wouldn't it ? >>Note : I don't mean you - in person - but shouldn't you be aware, that this kind >>of ridiculius setups influence the ELO ranking - in a missleading way ? > >It is the usual way in the ssdf >This is the reason that in the rating we have Junior5(p200) and Rebel8(p90) >New programs always get better hardware in the ssdf games and they do not hide >it. > >Uri Which I consider as one of the major problems itself. BTW - I never wrote, you'd " hide " something, did I ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.