Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 16:41:11 12/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 22, 2003 at 19:32:05, Gene Anderson wrote: >On December 22, 2003 at 19:00:42, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On December 22, 2003 at 18:22:59, Gene Anderson wrote: >> >>>On December 22, 2003 at 18:03:29, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On December 22, 2003 at 17:49:21, Gene Anderson wrote: >>>> >>>>>Even if the morons on the board can't understand the sporting aspect of computer >>>>>chess. >>>> >>>> >>>>Must you use so many different handles to post here? >>>> >>>>"a crowd of one" comes to mind. >>> >>> >>> And if you are Wrong? Does it matter to you if you offend? >> >> >>Please read carefully! - How can you call a veritable Wch and Professor of >>computer sciences a moron?? That alone looks very immature, so it is simple to >>check you out. Apparently those who spoiled the WCCC in Graz have only people in >>defense who don't know the details good enough. One good argument would be >>enough - but! But there is not a single one. That is very telling. All that you >>have is namecalling and insults. That's why the suicide of the TD board of ICGA >>is completed. >> >>Rolf > > > > Rolf > > I'ts pretty Clear from your obvious Worship of Robert Hyatt, that you are very >impressed with his academic credentials, it also reveals that you are a person >that comes from an uneducated familly, if you think that because one holds a >professorship then this automatically makes one immune to ignorance, or endowed >with some special intelligence. A man can hold a ton of Degrees and still be the >most ignorant Baffoon. Mr Hyaat was also very disrespectful and insulting to >Darse Billing who is also a PHD, i guess this makes Hyatt immature also >according to your own logic? Since you Esteem those with Degrees to be without >blemish. Reading Mr Billing Rebutall he came across to me and a very intelligent >logical person, who did not deserve the Disdain and slander he recieved here. I respectfully disagree. This is the way arguments are started. One insults another. Then the insulted party returns the favor. Then the first party conveniently forgets his own initial transgressions and retaliates for the his victim's latest counter insult. This could go on forever, each side feeling justified in more and more meanness. The situation only becomes worse when "disinterested" bystanders throw fuel on the fire. I suggest that we try to adopt the spirit of the season and make an effort to be nice to each other. Does the world have to be filled with meanness? Bob D.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.