Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:36:43 12/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 22, 2003 at 19:41:11, Bob Durrett wrote: >On December 22, 2003 at 19:32:05, Gene Anderson wrote: > >>On December 22, 2003 at 19:00:42, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On December 22, 2003 at 18:22:59, Gene Anderson wrote: >>> >>>>On December 22, 2003 at 18:03:29, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 22, 2003 at 17:49:21, Gene Anderson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Even if the morons on the board can't understand the sporting aspect of computer >>>>>>chess. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Must you use so many different handles to post here? >>>>> >>>>>"a crowd of one" comes to mind. >>>> >>>> >>>> And if you are Wrong? Does it matter to you if you offend? >>> >>> >>>Please read carefully! - How can you call a veritable Wch and Professor of >>>computer sciences a moron?? That alone looks very immature, so it is simple to >>>check you out. Apparently those who spoiled the WCCC in Graz have only people in >>>defense who don't know the details good enough. One good argument would be >>>enough - but! But there is not a single one. That is very telling. All that you >>>have is namecalling and insults. That's why the suicide of the TD board of ICGA >>>is completed. >>> >>>Rolf >> >> >> >> Rolf >> >> I'ts pretty Clear from your obvious Worship of Robert Hyatt, that you are very >>impressed with his academic credentials, it also reveals that you are a person >>that comes from an uneducated familly, if you think that because one holds a >>professorship then this automatically makes one immune to ignorance, or endowed >>with some special intelligence. A man can hold a ton of Degrees and still be the >>most ignorant Baffoon. Mr Hyaat was also very disrespectful and insulting to >>Darse Billing who is also a PHD, i guess this makes Hyatt immature also >>according to your own logic? Since you Esteem those with Degrees to be without >>blemish. Reading Mr Billing Rebutall he came across to me and a very intelligent >>logical person, who did not deserve the Disdain and slander he recieved here. > >I respectfully disagree. This is the way arguments are started. One insults >another. Then the insulted party returns the favor. Then the first party >conveniently forgets his own initial transgressions and retaliates for the his >victim's latest counter insult. This could go on forever, each side feeling >justified in more and more meanness. The situation only becomes worse when >"disinterested" bystanders throw fuel on the fire. > >I suggest that we try to adopt the spirit of the season and make an effort to be >nice to each other. Does the world have to be filled with meanness? > >Bob D. Not "meanness". "stupidity". :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.