Author: Slater Wold
Date: 19:32:38 12/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 22, 2003 at 22:26:36, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On December 22, 2003 at 21:43:21, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>Let me quote the email posted 21/11/2003. >> >>it is very clear that the hardware setup chosen by Peter Berger is what you >>referred to as: > >It's a moot point anyway. Crafty won so get over it... > >Yes, I apparently said that. I didn't remember doing so, but that's >life. > >Sorry to disappoint you. By the way, the other night on ICC you made >the statement "Let me beat up on Crafty even without using a book." Someone >said you claimed to be using an 8-way itanium against my dual xeon. > >How did that go? :) > >Your statements are generally much worse than mine, but you can't >back 'em up at all which makes 'em worse... > >I could post your _exact_ words in channel 64 if you want. Crafty logs >_everything_ that goes on in channel 64, channel 211, and all kibitzes. >You might want to remember that in the future, and tone down your rhetoric? > >I also saw the nonsense about "Hyatt only lets me play one game which will boost >his rating..." From someone that ought to know how the xboard done=0 and done=1 >flags work. I am using _all_ 6-piece tables, because Eugene asked me to test >the new code thoroughly. It takes 8-10 seconds to initialize. If you try to >rematch too quickly, xboard says "I'm not quite ready ..." No, it wasn't done >for your benefit. _everybody_ knows how that works, except, apparently, you. >Note also that if I was trying to maximize my rating, I would have had >"autorematch" enabled when playing you. > >:) You sure have been fiesty lately!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.