Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Komputer Korner's standards as a reviewer, was Re: openings

Author: Komputer Korner

Date: 21:10:34 11/23/98

Go up one level in this thread


On November 23, 1998 at 15:42:19, Lawrence S. Tamarkin wrote:

>On November 23, 1998 at 01:08:47, Komputer Korner wrote:
>
>>On November 21, 1998 at 16:55:10, Lawrence S. Tamarkin wrote:
>>
>>>Please remember that this is the, COMPUTER CHESS CLUB. So your question would
>>>have been more thematcally phrased, as, 'anyone have a good recommendation of a
>>>program for opening study'.  If that was question, then I personnally recommend
>>>going over to the 'Computer Chess Resource Center', and spending some time
>>>looking at the many reviews of chess software their, especially reviews on
>>>software that concentrates on the opening. (Like Book-UP, or Fide Chess
>>>Encyclopedia).
>>>
>>>Personally, I recently bought the Chess Assistant product, 'Encyclopedia Of
>>>Middlegames', which has many positions for test & study in the most popular
>>>openings, and I am enjoying it greatly. It is reseably priced, is thrifty on HD
>>>space (3.1 mbyt.), and has around 900 examples.
>>>
>>>If your question was indeed, just asking for  good openings that posters will
>>>share, your best bet would be to go over to the chess newsgroup,
>>>rec.games.chess.analysis
>>>
>>>mrslug - the inkompetent chess software addict!
>>>
>>>
>>>On November 21, 1998 at 10:32:04, morgan dickey wrote:
>>>
>>>>anyone have any good openings they will share??
>>
>>
>>Larry your addiction is showing. I have looked at ECM and it barely escaped my
>>krash list. I cannot recommend it. Besides the fact that it is misnamed it is
>>not comprehensive and is missing many important openings. It was a rush job.
>>--
>>Komputer Korner
>
>Your right about my addiction, but I think your possibly too high standards as a
>reviewer are showing!  When I go over to, www.Siskel-Ebert, and see some of the
>stuff those guys say about the movies that I enjoyed or hated, I have to think,
>'Well oh yeah, these guys see every movie made, their demands on the story's
>intricacy and the Actor's capabilities are often too high.' (And sometimes they
>are just wrong, and I wonder if we saw the same movie.
>
>Man, sometimes I just want to be entertained! - if the flick has done that, I
>can often forgive some of the film's week spots.  'Idependence Day', was as
>derivitive as any Science Fiction movie ever made, is an example of a movie that
>was very entertaining, but the story was just pretty silly. (And it made a lot
>of money).
>
>Encyclopedia of Middlegames, has these things going for it; low price
>entertainment value and usefulness are all there. ECM gets 4 L's out of 5 on the
>Larry scale.

Larry, CA brought out an earlier program that was called CA Chess Openings that
was much better. I stand by what I said. I don't know the ECM price but CA Chess
Openings wasn't expensive.
--
Komputer Korner



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.