Author: swaminathan natarajan
Date: 03:15:58 12/23/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 23, 2003 at 05:17:27, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On December 23, 2003 at 04:32:43, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > >>On December 23, 2003 at 04:00:35, Tony Werten wrote: >> >>>On December 23, 2003 at 02:04:56, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>(I see same result below yes.) Not a dream start - it indicates after only 4 >>>>games, that Ruffian 99% sure is not at S7.04 level. It was start of Nunn match >>>>ans R2 start to play better with total result 9 - 11. Same match againt Fritz8 >>>>8,5-11,5. >>>>These are good result and indicate, that Ruffian is may be 50 points improved, >>>>which I consider enough to buy it! >>>>At least one thing is sure: Ruffian is yhe strongest program in the world >>>>WITHOUT copy protection (I am not sure about Lokasoft engines). >>> >>>Don't forget to claim that it is the strongest engine in the world that starts >>>with an R and ends with uffian. >> >>Seriously, Tony. I doubt that there is another wb-engine which could do better >>against Shredder. >> >>The claim Ruffian to be the strongest wb-engine seems quite reasonable to me. >>Perhaps Bruce's private monster is the most serious candidate to throw doubts on >>this. But Ferret isn't available; so we don't have too many results. >> >>Admittedly, it's a bit of an offensive style of advertising. >>But doubtlessly, Perola has done an excellent job. >> >>Looking to the results published by Pablo in another post here >>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?337781 >> >>which is >>PABLO-ILFE1CXZX, Blitz:9'+3 2003 >> >> 123456789012345678901234 >>1 Shredder 7.04 00011½0½½1111110½0½11111 15.5/24 >>2 Ruffian 2.0.0 11100½1½½0000001½1½00000 8.5/24 >> >>nicely demonstrates how unreliable a result of a 4-game match is. Fluctuations >>are just too big to make conclusions. >> >>Have nice holidays, >>Uli >> >> >>> >>>Tony >>> >>>> >>>>Jouni >>>> >>>>PS. Season greetings to all here > >Hi there, > >against Shredder 7.04 is this a bad results !! > >In my 100 games match Ruffian 2.0.0 losed with 47,5 : 52,5 but Ruffian 2.0.0 >have better results in a bigger group of amateur engines as Shredder 7.04 under >Arena Chess GUI (Shredder don't play with his own book). Interesting is that >Ruffian made 60% after 30 games with 40 moves in 5 minutes vs. Shredder 7.04! > >I wrote this last months! >I believe that Ruffian 2.0.0 is a little bit more as 100 ELO stronger as Ruffian >1.0.1 or maybe 80 ELO stronger as Ruffian 1.0.5 with 40 moves in 10 minutes on >my Pentium IV 2,67 GHz Notebook. > >Today I saw the results from Alexander Schmidt in my forum. Ruffian is after >more as 100 games 70 ELO stronger as Ruffian 1.0.5. > >Exactly 17 ELO more and Alexander have my ELO rating result after 600 games >under Arena Chess GUI (played with Ruffian 2.0.0 test versions ... compare to >Ruffian 1.0.5). > >The results vs. Shredder are very interesting because I am sure that Shredder is >the number 1 for the moment. More interesting are games with longer time >controls because its nice to see that Ruffian is very very strong in long time >analyzes and switch the move often after 4-6 minutes on my Pentium IV 2,67 >Notebook. Reason enough that Ruffian 2.0.0 is for me the most interesting >engines for long time anlyzes _with_ Shredder 7.04 (I saw that Shredder 7.04 >give me very very strong long time analyzes too). > >I am to 100% sure that Ruffian is the strongest WB engines in the World, >speaking from engines which are commercial or free avaialble. I know only one >amateur program which make a little bit more as 50% in longer matches vs. >Ruffian but this engine is so far a private program but the results vs. other >engines are not to strong compare to Ruffian 2.0.0! > >It's possible that Patriot is a little bit better as Ruffian 2.0.0! >We will see ... > >Patriot is my second CD project! >First results are in the next weeks available ... > >Best >Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.