Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 07:15:39 12/23/03
Go up one level in this thread
Mehr über den WM-Test steht hier:
More about my WM-Test Suite, read here (german):
http://www.f22.parsimony.net/forum41668/messages/27785.htm
Hardware = P600E
PB = Off
Hash = 64 Mb, 64 Mb
TBs = Off
Stufe = 30 Min. Aktivschach
Ruffian 2.0.0 vs. Shredder 7.04, now 10 - 8 !
Game 17:
[Event "P600, Stufe = 30'"]
[Site "Privat"]
[Date "2003.??.??"]
[Round "17"]
[White "Shredder 7.04"]
[Black "Ruffian 2.0.0"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "E19"]
[PlyCount "162"]
[EventDate "2003.??.??"]
{W=13.9 ply; 154kN/s B=14.6 ply; 375kN/s} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3
Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 Ne4 8. Qc2 Nxc3 9. Qxc3 f5 10. b3 Bf6 11. Bb2
d6 12. Rad1 Qe7 {Beide letzter Buchzug} 13. Qd2 {0.20/11 37} Nd7 {0.08/12 72}
14. Ne1 {0.23/10 36} Rab8 {
(Le4) 0.09/12 42 Interessanter Zug gegen Computer. Das werde ich mir merken.}
15. Bxb7 {0.31/10 11} Rxb7 {0.11/11 20} 16. Nd3 {0.32/12 33} c6 {
(b5) 0.14/11 48} 17. e3 {(Tfe1) 0.35/12 43} Rc8 {0.14/10 33} 18. Rc1 {
(La3) 0.29/11 38} Rbc7 {(e5) 0.12/10 32} 19. Rfe1 {0.45/11 37} d5 {
(Tf8) 0.15/11 46} 20. Qc2 {(c5) 0.47/10 33} g6 {(Dd6) 0.14/10 69} 21. Qd2 {
(b4) 0.30/10 29} dxc4 {(Dd6) 0.12/11 35} 22. Rxc4 {0.27/11 11} c5 {0.17/11 36}
23. dxc5 {(Tec1) 0.42/11 62} Bxb2 {-0.03/12 28} 24. Qxb2 {0.34/13 28} b5 {
(Sxc5) 0.02/13 30} 25. Rc3 {0.40/12 34} Nxc5 {0.05/13 27} 26. Rxc5 {0.33/12 30}
Rxc5 {0.02/12 10} 27. Nxc5 {0.27/14 26} Qxc5 {(Txc5) 0.07/12 28 Nach sowiel
Tausch, wie soll da einer noch gewinnen? Im Endspiel ist Ruffian 2.0.0
jedenfalls nicht schlechter als Shredder 7.04, so mein bisheriger Eindruck.}
28. Rd1 {0.45/13 40} Qe7 {(b4) 0.14/12 35} 29. Qe5 {(De2) 0.53/11 9} Rc5 {
0.27/13 60} 30. Qb8+ {(Dd6) 0.53/11 12} Kg7 {0.22/12 26} 31. Rd6 {
(b4) 0.40/12 53} Rc7 {0.30/12 58} 32. Rd4 {(Td3) 0.29/11 27} e5 {0.07/13 39}
33. Rd5 {0.12/12 32} Rc5 {(b4) 0.03/12 27} 34. Rd8 {0.32/12 30} Rc2 {
(e4) 0.00/12 40} 35. Rg8+ {(Te8) 0.31/11 64} Kf7 {(Kf6) 0.00/12 22} 36. Rh8 {
0.23/11 27} Kg7 {0.00/12 19} 37. Rg8+ {0.31/11 24} Kf7 {(Kf6) 0.00/13 25} 38.
Rh8 {0.36/11 5} Kg7 {0.00/14 21} 39. Kg2 {0.26/10 19} f4 {0.00/10 19} 40. exf4
{(g4) 0.53/10 27} exf4 {0.30/12 34} 41. Re8 {0.28/11 51} Qc7 {(f3+) 0.39/11 22}
42. Qxc7+ {0.82/12 21} Rxc7 {0.35/12 5} 43. Rb8 {(gxf4) 0.72/14 23} fxg3 {
(a6) 0.48/14 33} 44. hxg3 {0.64/16 15} a6 {0.61/15 23} 45. Rb6 {0.86/15 9} Ra7
{0.66/15 24 Jetzt steht weiss besser.} 46. f4 {0.94/14 13} Kf8 {
(Kg8) 0.68/14 15} 47. g4 {(Kf3) 1.04/14 14} Ke7 {0.67/14 26} 48. Kf3 {
1.21/15 23} Kd7 {(Kf7) 0.84/14 26} 49. f5 {1.21/14 10} gxf5 {(Kc7) 1.04/15 30}
50. gxf5 {1.23/14 7} Ke8 {(Kc7) 0.93/14 15} 51. Kg4 {(Kf4) 1.16/15 16} Kf7 {
1.02/13 17} 52. Kg5 {1.12/15 19} Kg7 {(Kf8) 1.05/15 16} 53. a3 {1.13/14 19} Kf8
{(Kg8) 1.05/15 12} 54. b4 {(Kh6) 1.09/13 17 Diesen Bauernzug finde ich nicht
gut weil schwarz evtl. irgendwann mit a6-a5 drohen koennte} Rg7+ {1.19/14 24}
55. Kf4 {1.24/16 16} Ra7 {1.03/14 14} 56. Ke5 {(Tb8+) 1.08/17 49} Re7+ {
0.76/14 16} 57. Kd5 {(Kd4) 1.07/15 16} Rd7+ {0.98/15 20} 58. Kc6 {
(Ke4) 1.42/16 25} Rf7 {0.88/15 14} 59. Rxa6 {
1.66/15 15 Es scheint nun so dass weiss gewinnen koennte.} h5 {(Txf5) 1.48/16
112 Ruffian findet den einzig moeglichen Verteidigungszug der nicht verliert,
bzw. wonach es nicht einfach ist fuer weiss zu gewinnen. Und nochmal: Beide
Programme spielen ohne die Tablebases und muessen selbst den richtigen Weg
finden!} 60. Kxb5 {(a4) 2.27/11 4} Rxf5+ {1.18/14 14} 61. Kc4 {2.14/13 27} h4 {
1.28/14 14} 62. Rh6 {2.14/12 11} Rf4+ {1.19/14 10} 63. Kd5 {2.03/13 18} Kg7 {
1.18/14 12} 64. Ke5 {(Th5) 1.94/13 12} Rg4 {(Tc4) 1.23/14 8} 65. Kf5 {
1.94/13 13} Rd4 {1.16/13 8} 66. Rc6 {1.96/12 10} h3 {(Td5+) 0.96/13 12} 67.
Rg6+ {(Tc7+) 2.17/13 12} Kh7 {1.27/15 12} 68. Rg1 {2.23/14 11} Rd3 {
(Th4) 1.35/14 11} 69. a4 {2.59/12 4} Rd4 {1.37/14 6} 70. Rh1 {2.31/15 12} Rxb4
{1.66/17 14} 71. Rxh3+ {1.68/17 22} Kg7 {1.82/17 9} 72. Ra3 {2.16/17 12} Kf7 {
1.61/16 7} 73. a5 {1.60/16 12} Ke7 {(Tb7) 1.16/15 10} 74. a6 {2.23/13 2} Rb8 {
0.00/14 8} 75. a7 {(Ke5) 0.05/14 16} Ra8 {0.00/19 4} 76. Ra6 {(Ke5) 0.05/15 10}
Kd7 {0.00/22 5} 77. Ra2 {(Ke5) 0.04/17 12} Kc6 {0.00/21 4} 78. Ke6 {
(Ke5) 0.02/20 9} Kb6 {(Kb7) 0.00/21 5} 79. Rb2+ {(Ke7) 0.02/19 16} Kxa7 {
(Kc6) 0.00/20 1} 80. Rg2 {(Kf6) 0.02/20 10} Ka6 {(Kb8) 0.00/21 4} 81. Kd7 {
(Kf6) 0.00/18 7} Kb6 {(Th8) Remis angenommen 0.00/21 4} 1/2-1/2
Shredder 7.04 - Ruffian 2.0.0
Ruffian find strong h7-h5! without TBs
[D]5k2/5r1p/R1K5/1p3P2/1P6/P7/8/8 b - - 0 1
German:
Hier im Zug 59, findet Ruffian 2.0.0 ohne die Tablebases die interessante
Verteidigung mittels h7-h5!? Ich als Mensch, hätte hier ehrlich gesagt versagt!
Game 18: Ruffian 2.0.0 holzt Shredder 7.04 einfach ab!
[Event "P600, Stufe = 30'"]
[Site "Privat"]
[Date "2003.??.??"]
[Round "18"]
[White "Ruffian 2.0.0"]
[Black "Shredder 7.04"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "E19"]
[PlyCount "111"]
[EventDate "2003.??.??"]
{W=12.1 ply; 379kN/s B=11.9 ply; 128kN/s} 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3
Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. Nc3 Ne4 8. Qc2 Nxc3 9. Qxc3 f5 10. b3 Bf6 11. Bb2
d6 12. Rad1 Qe7 {Beide letzter Buchzug} 13. Ne1 {-0.05/12 44} c5 {
(Lxg2) 0.34/10 9} 14. Bxb7 {(Dd2) 0.06/12 44} Qxb7 {0.11/11 7} 15. Qd2 {
(De3) 0.09/12 37} cxd4 {0.28/12 47} 16. Bxd4 {0.03/13 47} Be7 {(Sc6) 0.40/12 31
} 17. Nd3 {(De3) 0.12/11 40} Na6 {(Sc6) 0.29/12 42} 18. f3 {(De3) 0.07/10 32}
e5 {(Tac8) 0.10/11 32} 19. Be3 {(Lc3) 0.03/11 37} Rad8 {(Tac8) -0.03/10 30} 20.
Bg5 {(Dc2) 0.07/10 34} Bxg5 {(Dc7) -0.01/11 35} 21. Qxg5 {0.10/10 11 Wie ich
merke, hat Ruffian nichts gegen Abtausch von Figuren. Da hat er aber auch
Recht, denn im Endspiel ist er derzeit das beste Programm, nur meine Meinung!}
b5 {(Sc7) -0.01/12 72} 22. cxb5 {(e3) 0.10/11 36} Qxb5 {-0.24/11 30} 23. Rc1 {
(Kh1) 0.19/11 30} Rde8 {(Sc7) -0.32/10 39} 24. Rc3 {(Kg2) 0.19/10 32} Nc7 {
(e4) -0.67/11 26} 25. Rc4 {(Tfc1) 0.01/11 115} Qb6+ {(f4) -0.58/11 67} 26. Kh1
{0.05/11 25} Ne6 {(e4) -0.27/11 49} 27. Qd2 {0.14/12 36} Kh8 {(f4) -0.14/11 36}
28. Rfc1 {(Sb4) 0.34/11 24} Rd8 {(e4) -0.06/11 41} 29. Nb4 {(Kg2) 0.62/11 27}
Qf2 {(Da5) 0.20/12 43} 30. Nc6 {0.83/11 23} Rde8 {(e4) 0.17/12 30} 31. Qe1 {
0.95/12 23} Qb6 {(Dxe1+) 0.60/12 44} 32. Rd1 {1.03/11 23} f4 {0.88/12 50} 33.
Rxd6 {0.83/12 43} Nd4 {0.98/11 39} 34. g4 {1.16/11 21} Qc7 {(Ta8) 1.23/11 26}
35. Qb4 {1.37/12 22} Nxc6 {1.23/12 13} 36. Rcxc6 {1.50/12 21} Qe7 {1.14/13 40}
37. Qe4 {(Dc3) 1.55/11 28 Weiss steht klar besser.} Rg8 {(Dh4) 1.53/12 41} 38.
Rd5 {1.89/12 31} Rgf8 {(Da3) 1.56/11 19} 39. Rcc5 {(Kg2) 2.22/11 26} a6 {
(Dh4) 2.13/11 25} 40. Rxe5 {(Kg2) 2.50/12 36} Qd8 {(Df7) 2.68/12 40} 41. Kg2 {
(Txe8) 2.60/11 41} Qb8 {(h6) 2.82/11 17} 42. Re6 {3.19/12 19} Rxe6 {3.10/11 18}
43. Qxe6 {3.47/12 11} a5 {(Da8) 3.31/12 23} 44. Rxa5 {4.01/13 22} Re8 {
4.08/12 34} 45. Qc4 {4.12/13 24} Qb7 {(Dd8) 4.45/12 44} 46. Rf5 {
(Tc5) 4.63/12 17} Qe7 {4.78/11 34} 47. Kh3 {(Txf4) 4.97/12 15} Qa3 {
(h6) 4.48/11 18} 48. Qxf4 {(b4) 5.22/12 15} Rg8 {4.78/12 27} 49. Qd2 {
5.37/12 14} Qe7 {(Da7) 4.85/11 14} 50. Rd5 {(e4) 5.51/12 17} Qf8 {
(Df6) 5.49/12 33} 51. b4 {(Td7) 5.80/12 14} Qa8 {5.86/12 22} 52. Rd7 {
6.05/12 21} h6 {(Dc6) 5.95/11 14} 53. g5 {(Kg2) 6.88/12 13} Qf8 {
(De8) 6.98/11 22} 54. gxh6 {6.84/12 14} Qf5+ {7.11/10 6} 55. Kh4 {7.16/12 24}
g5+ {(Df6+) 7.44/11 13} 56. Kg3 {
7.09/12 11 Ruffian hat Shredder einfach abgeholzt!} 1-0
Eduard Nemeth
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.