Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Do hideous DOS-based progs bother anyone else?

Author: Thom Perry

Date: 06:45:30 11/24/98

Go up one level in this thread


On November 24, 1998 at 07:36:07, Albert Silver wrote:

>
>   I for one have nothing against the look of the pieces, and it is a fair sight
>better than some others (I've always thought that MChess Pro, up til 7.1 (don't
>know what the 8.0 version looks like), despite being one of my favourite
>"playing" programs, had a good handle on ugliness). Of course you'll argue that
>just because there are uglier, doesn't mean it's ok to be unsightly. Truth of

Beauty is definitely in the eyes of the beholder, for I for one think that
M-Chess Pro has the best looking 2-D chess board and pieces!  I think it also
has the best book/players move display.


>the matter is, I think Rebel's pieces are not bad, but beauty here truly is in
>the eye of the beholder here. I read one response saying they liked Winboard's
>pieces. Frankly, on my ugly list they rank no. 2, but that's just me. Rebel's
>pieces haven't changed really in quite some time, so one can assume that Ed
>Schroeder (the programmer) hasn't exactly been inundated by complaints about the
>program's appearance. Perhaps a choice of set and pieces in the program would be
>Fritz/CB engine for Hiarcs 7 in case you're wondering. Reviews of these programs
>can be found at WCCR (Web Computer Chess Reports) should you be interested:
>http://www.icdchess.com/wccr/index.shtml
>Reviews are accepted by all, so if you want to contribute, feel free to do so.
>It isn't about patting each other on the back, so if you disagree, and feel the
>taste of bile in your mouth when staring at a program, don't hesitate to say so.
>
>                                   Albert Silver



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.