Author: Mark Young
Date: 10:48:27 12/25/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 25, 2003 at 13:12:10, Bob Durrett wrote: > >Suppose you were much richer than Bill Gates and wanted to make the biggest, >meanest, most fantastic chess computer. Suppose you wanted a dedicated chess >computer so big that it topped the list of the World's biggest computers. What >would it look like? > >The problem IBM had with Deep Blue was that they didn't want to spend BIG money >on the computer. But you could be different! Be extravagant! > >Special purpose computers are optimized for a very limited purpose, by >definition. For example, if it were desired to create a special purpose >computer to model the Earth's atmosphere, globally, and if it were desired that >the model be "high fidelity" and capable of modelling repid events such as >tornatos and lightning, then the structure and operation of that computer and >it's software would be optimized for that purpose and would never be used for >any other purpose. It, I suspect, would not look very much like a >general-purpose computer. > >What if you were **rich** and wanted to make a really huge chess research >machine that would blow everybody's imagination? > >This is a call for brilliant ideas! [If there is no response, you know what >that'll mean. : ) ] > >Bob D. I never understood why people would spend so much money on a multi-CPU machine so they could play blitz chess on ICC. So I would not be much help here.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.