Author: Mridul Muralidharan
Date: 15:40:57 12/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 2003 at 16:13:26, Luis Smith wrote: >On December 26, 2003 at 15:34:43, Darren Rushton wrote: > >>>Actually what happens, is the 366 is SLOW. And I mean SLOW. >> >>I don't intend to be controversial here, but the conclusion I draw from your >>results is that Shredder 7 is such a brilliant program it is almost a match for >>the one of the better amateur programs on hardware that's almost 10 times >>slower. >> >>Regards, >> >>Darren > >I think you're missing the point of these experiments. Some people here were >saying that Crafty isn't a world contender. Bob could get much better hardware >than most of the commercials. He mentioned something about a 32 way box. Can >you imagine the speed of Crafty on something like that? > >I don't think anyone can count Crafty out after this experiment. You also need to get decent speedup on those boxes :) And I hope it is not a shared bus 32 proc bus ;) A 4/8 cpu opteron against a 32 proc alpha is not fair - for crafty - it would lose again against say shredder or fritz. Mridul
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.