Author: Komputer Korner
Date: 11:36:23 11/24/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 24, 1998 at 12:12:33, Francois Bertin wrote: >On November 24, 1998 at 09:40:07, Georg Langrath wrote: > >>I feel a little bit sorry for chessprogrammers. They shall always find new >>features in order to convince us that we need to buy their new product. But >>what more do we want in features? Any ideas? > > In a future version of Rebel, to take an example, I would be less >interested in stronger play than in options for a more sophistated >game analysis (i.e. choice of candidate moves, best second move, etc.) >and most of all, more options to help a player develop his chess >abilities and understanding while playing the program, i.e. a coaching >option that would warn a player if he makes a tactical or positional >mistake. However, this is rather hard to implement effectively in >a chess program. > > Among other things, an option to weaken the program's playing >strenght by limiting its book depth would be very useful; It's not >easy to try to beat Rebel, even if it is set at 1200 ELO, when it >still can use grandmaster knowledge in the opening... :-) > > Regards, > François Bertin Rebel 8,9, and 10 already gives you the choice of candidate moves submenu called Analysis Include. -- Komputer Korner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.