Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: do all programs see this draw here....

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 13:29:57 12/27/03

Go up one level in this thread


On December 27, 2003 at 02:48:28, Steffen Jakob wrote:

>Hi Mike,
>
>you forgot to mention this nice page:
>
>http://www.chessbase.com/puzzle/christmas2003/chr03-2a.htm
>
>Greetings,
>Steffen.

A couple of notes.


1.  Friedel is wrong about the B+wrong rook pawn in CB.  It did have that
bit of knowledge.  This game was played well before Harry had joined the
team, and was against USCF master Joe Sentef in the 1981 Mississippi Closed
State Championship event, which CB handily won 5-0 in fact.  I had sent the
entire log to Ken Thompson, as this was the first time a master had been
beaten by a computer in long time control games, and he was working with some
writer that published the game and the log excerpts in the Chess Life magazine
that year.  He tried it on Belle and Belle could not see the draw for
something like 18 minutes.  CB never considered taking the piece was good,
the score was a draw immediagely and it knew that...

Harry might well have been confused by the fact that after moving the B, it
could see the promotion, but even before that it realized that taking the
piece was no good.  As far as the logs go, back then there were no "log
files".  All I had was a hard-copy printout, which I still have in my files
along with the Belle analysis Ken did.  Harry never had any "files" as we
simply didn't produce them back then...


2.  I also remember Botvinnik and the Bd7 position.  That was neither the
first nor last time where a GM would be out-searched by Cray Blitz, over
the years.  I also showed him that we could tactically solve his Ba3 position
very quickly, thanks to raw speed.  :)  This happened in NY in 1983 by the
way, at the first WCCC event we won...

The first special-purpose piece of knowledge I did was "square of the
king" so that my old programs would not get hoodwinked in positions
where a pawn could not be caught/stopped.  It wasn't more than a year
later where the bishop plus wrong-rook-pawn was added as humans used that
to trick it a few times in won endings.  The Sentef game was an example.




>
>On December 27, 2003 at 00:51:11, Mike Byrne wrote:
>
>>
>>[d]8/r7/8/5bk1/8/5B2/5RPP/6K1 b - - 0 1
>>Crafty19.08 SE  UCI 2 MB:
>> 7   00:00  0.01   1. ... Ra1+ 2.Rf1 Rxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Bh3 4.gxh3
>> 8   00:00  0.01   1. ... Ra1+ 2.Rf1 Rxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Bh3 4.gxh3
>> 9   00:00  0.01   1. ... Ra1+ 2.Rf1 Rxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Bh3 4.gxh3
>>10   00:00  0.01   1. ... Ra1+ 2.Rf1 Rxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Bh3 4.gxh3
>>11   00:00  0.01   1. ... Ra1+ 2.Rf1 Rxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Bh3 4.gxh3
>>12   00:00  0.01   1. ... Ra1+ 2.Rf1 Rxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Bh3 4.gxh3
>>13   00:01  0.01   1. ... Ra1+ 2.Rf1 Rxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Bh3 4.gxh3
>>14   00:04  0.01   1. ... Ra1+ 2.Rf1 Rxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Bh3 4.gxh3
>>15   00:06  0.01   1. ... Ra1+ 2.Rf1 Rxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Bh3 4.gxh3



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.