Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 00:22:17 12/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2003 at 02:40:15, Slater Wold wrote: >On December 28, 2003 at 01:36:50, enrico carrisco wrote: > >>On December 27, 2003 at 12:22:30, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On December 27, 2003 at 07:49:34, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote: >>> >>>>. >>> >>>Athlon 64 FX51 (2.2Ghz) = 1.64M nps >>>Opteron 2.2Ghz = 1.64M nps >>>Athlon 64 3200+ (2.0Ghz) = 1.50M nps >>>P4 3.6Ghz = 1.48M nps >>>AMD Athlon XP 3200+ (2.2Ghz) = 1.45M nps >>>P4 3.2Ghz Extreme Edition = 1.37M nps >>>Opteron 1.8Ghz = 1.35M nps >>>P4 3.0Ghz = 1.23M nps >> >>Did you run all these tests or have they been calculated another way? >> >>-elc. > >I ran the FX51, the P4 3.6, and the P4 3.0Ghz tests. > >The others were calculated based on SPEC. Reason I ask is because 1.45M nps for an XP 2.2GHz with an unoptimized (or not fully optimized) binary is a bit overstated in my opinion. 1.54M nps is what Aaron's 2.5GHz XP with an *optmized* binary gets. Since I have never seen anyone with a faster AMD binary than Aaron, I have to guess that the one you ran wouldn't be either. Thus, with Aaron's binary, an XP 2.2 should get ~ 1.36M nps. -elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.