Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Dual core AMD

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 18:32:17 12/28/03

Go up one level in this thread


On December 28, 2003 at 20:55:34, K. Burcham wrote:

>On December 28, 2003 at 19:51:45, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On December 28, 2003 at 00:26:44, K. Burcham wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>interesting article on the dual core AMD.
>>>what do you think about these numbers. maybe too optimistic?
>>>
>>>based on Crafty 19.8 benchmarks posted here.
>>>If the 248 opteron will get 1640 knps,
>>>If the dual 248 will get 2296 knps,
>>
>>These are bad.  IE the dual 248 comes very close to doubling the
>>nps of the single 248, based on the 1-2-4 846 numbers I posted here
>>a couple of weeks ago.
>>
>>>If the future dual core AMD gets 2296 knps,
>>
>>
>>It should do better than that.  Whether it will equal a dual 84x is
>>speculation (but not likely) but it ought to get reasonably decent
>>performance.  IE close to 2x...
>>
>>
>>>then maybe the dual core in smp will get 3214.
>>
>>
>>two dual-cores ought to be within spitting distance of four single
>>processors, the question is how much will the memory contention for
>>a single controller impact performance...
>
>
>The AMD 64 has 105.9 million transistors now with a die size of 190mm.
>I know they plan on another shrink soon, but if AMD is going to put 211.8
>million transistors on a single die, then it would seem there are many issues.
>the processor would be large with 211.8 million on one processor.
>maybe only commercial.
>maybe no ATX motherboard, server.
>no ATX power supply, server.
>four processors in one case, several fans, noise.
>large ram, maybe 2-4 gigs or more, expensive.
>for the home builders, this may be too expensive.
>
>kburcham
>

There are alternatives.  IE the first big Intel chip was the Pentium Pro.
They used a dual-cavity carrier so that the L2 cache could be on a second
piece of silicon, but still very close to the CPU.  AMD could do that if they
like that approach.  Solves the huge transistor count problem...


>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=13344
>>>
>>>kburcham



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.