Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 22:15:09 12/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2003 at 21:04:33, Mike Byrne wrote: >Crafty 19.08 SE "Woodpusher" vs CM9K "Josh , 7 yrs, 1365" > >1400 Secane, PA USA 2003 > > 1234567890 >1 Crafty 19.08 SE 110101½110 6.5/10 >2 The King ST 001010½001 3.5/10 > >so after 30 games vs Josh at 6 yrs (1200), 7 yrs (1365) and 8 yrs (1600)years >...woodpusher scored 55% for a perfomance rating of 1428. > >Woodpusher has limited extensions, off piece values and search depth =3 with no >pondering. > >My next test is to have the same condtions with standard crafty piece values and >standard extensions with the search depth (3) and no pondering (like above). >My guess is that will full extensions and standard piece values , search depth >=3,and no pondering Crafty will play around 1600 (plus or minus 50 points). I >say this from amy personal experience, I'm rated around 1600 and when I play >sd=3, I feel Crafty and I are about even. > >(Boy , does that make 1600 sound weak (sd=3) , but "it is what it is".) final results ============================================================== woodpusher vs .... CM_Name rating games % Perf rating Josh 6 1200 10 80.00 1440 Josh 7 1365 10 65.00 1485 Hosh 8 1600 10 20.00 1360 total 1388 30 55.00% 1428 ================================================================== Crafty 19.08 SE,standard, search depth=3 vs.... CM_Name rating games % Perf rating Josh 6 1200 10 95.00 1560 Josh 7 1365 10 80.00 1605 Josh 8 1600 10 40.00 1520 total 1388 30 71.67.% 1562 interesting to note that in both cases - "Josh 7" was easier relative to stated rating and "Josh 8" was harder.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.