Author: Slater Wold
Date: 16:44:33 12/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2003 at 19:37:23, David H. McClain wrote: >On December 29, 2003 at 14:14:03, Slater Wold wrote: > >>There is a lot of talk that the HW experiment(s) Peter & I have run are no good, >>because the commercial is getting 'crappy' hardware. That a Celeron vs a P4 is >>not the same as a 2x2.8Ghz vs a 4x2.0Ghz Opteron. >> > >Slater, > >I find your experiment of testing with different hardware and software very >intriging. After all, not that many of us match up exactly with our opponents in >both hardware and software and your experiment was more like the real world. >It's too bad you are not going to continue your match as when it started. :( I am going to! I promise! The fan on the Celeron dying wasn't in the plan. And this is just a time killer really.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.